Goofy Posted:
<i>"The theory that he chose to disappear without a trace, that the plane crashed due to engine failure or that "UFO" activity was responsible all have equal support by available facts.
None.
</i>
firstly,I have given lots of <I>Indirect</i> facts suggesting that a UFO was the cause of his dissapearance.You gave some Indirect evidence too.Where's the question of None?
secondly,If my discussion about Fedrich Valentich can fetch anything ,that will be something.But i believe the Australians are competent enough to realise that they had a criminal in their hands that is too say <i>If</i> your assumption was true...may be you Indirectly point towards Australia's AF's Incompetence...then the matter is different.The point of a discussion certainly should be a suitable but agreeable end.You started this discussion with a valid thinkable evidence that Valentich was a criminal running away from something or you yourself suggested that Cessna might have some problems,but whats the damm point?Do you get any results for that?Was there any Direct evidence pointing that his engine might have failed because of reasons other than a UFO,neither you have given any direct evidence towards the fact that he might have done something criminal,do you have any evidence that it was
NOT BECAUSE OF A UFO?
I am sure you dont.If you do,please provide us with some evidence to Negate my own argument...
thanks....
bye!
PS:I MAY NOT BE ABLE TO REPLY FOR A COUPLE OF DAYS...JUST HAVE FEW TESTS LEFT....