Ophiolite said:How do you account for the similar anatomy between domestic cats and lions?
I don't know.
How do you?
Jan.
Ophiolite said:How do you account for the similar anatomy between domestic cats and lions?
Since they share a common ancestor the similarity is to be expected.
You have pretty well run dry now, haven't you Jan.
Answering questions, with questions.
You still haven't replied to my earlier post, by the way. Too substantial for you?
What is unscientific about it?Jan Ardena said:I can understand why you cite this as evidence, but it is not scientific evidence.
Ophiolite said:What is unscientific about it?
Ophiolite said:Answer my question first. That is the normal, polite way of conducting a discussion. I presume you wish to remain polite, yes?
Ophiolite said:Since they share a common ancestor the similarity is to be expected.
Jan said:I can understand why you cite this as evidence, but it is not scientific evidence.
Ophiolite said:What is unscientific about it?
Jan said:How do you know there is a common ancestor?
Originally Posted by Jan said:How do you know there is a common ancestor?
Ophiolite said:Observe, with interest A Darn Jane's debating style.
Refuse to answer any question directly.
Refuse to study the evidence, whilst implying the evidence has been studied.
Characterise the evidence as opinion.
Deny everything.
Answer questions with another question.
The technique is effective on two levels.
a) It frustrates those presenting a counter argument, as they are unable to penetrate her obfuscation and misdirection. [Not that they need to.]
b) It allows A Darn Jane to comfortably maintain her own delusions. [Although even the casual observer can see, not the holes in her logic, but the entire absence of logic.]
In general though, A Darn Jane's views do provide an interesting illustration of the evolutionary limitations of intelligence.
Jan Ardena said:How do you know there is a common ancestor?
Jan.
Domesticated animals did not exist prior to human "domestication" of the animals. We know this because fossil and bones of animals using carbon dating and geological layering, show that there are no animals matching the traits of modern domesticated animals and all domesticated animals are dated to our time.Jan Ardena said:I don't know.
How do you?
I must ask you to research this. But for now, I will give you this link I got from KennyJC's link of Google: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/default.html#theorytobetestedJan Ardena said:What is the scientific evidence that makes mackro evolution a scientific fact?
I believe he is confused because you constantly ask questions and pulling the debate past prior posts, which were full of interesting debating. Now, we just have you playing the clueless questioner.Jan Ardena said:Why?
Check above posts.Jan Ardena said:How do you know there is a common ancestor?
Ophiolite said:In essence Jan:
Your debating style is transparent.
Ophiolite said:Your refusal to engage in fruitful discussion is rude.
Ophiolite said:Your inability to comprehend the scientific method is attributable to stubborness.
Ophiolite said:Your self satisfied complaceny is quite unattractive.
I could go on, but as I have noted before, you paint yourself as a thoroughly unattractive person. Snide, smug, self-righteous, devious, dishonest, even nasty: and these are your positive points. Goodbye.
KennyJC said:Nobody is going to dig up research and write paragraphs of text for you to deny it before even reading.
KennyJC said:From what I have seen in this thread, you are basing what you know on macro evolution from what people are writing in this thread.
KennyJC said:You have not yet pasted quotes from respectable papers which you question, or shown any proof of reading up on the subject you show such spite for.
Renrue said:Domesticated animals did not exist prior to human "domestication" of the animals.
Renrue said:I believe he is confused because you constantly ask questions and pulling the debate past prior posts, which were full of interesting debating. Now, we just have you playing the clueless questioner.
Can you ask questions base on your own rationale even if you have not studied a field entirely?Jan Ardena said:Do you think you can explain why it is a scientific fact, without appealing to your authorities?
Back at you.Jan Ardena said:Hope you all had a merry CHRIST…mas.
Happy new year.
Jan.