Of course its possible. Not very probable, however. Given the amount of investigation and research into the subject that has come up empty. I'm speaking here, of course, about "psi," esp, remote viewing, etc.
Intuition is something else entirely. this is merely the natural human capacity to recognize patterns and anticipate effects. This is how we do well driving in heavy traffic, for instance. There is a distinct pattern to the traffic and deviant anomalies get our attention. We anticipate the behavior of other drivers and plan accordingly, etc. Some of us are better than others and we're better sometimes than others -depending on our level of attentiveness and alertness.
Intuition, therefore, is more than just possible -it is a very probable condition.
a reasonable position I think Skin walker.
However i question just how much computation is required by a person driving in heavy traffic [ using your example ]to not only avoid collisions but drive smoothly, talk on a cell phone and plan that weekends activities.
I would guess that even our biggest super computers would fail miserably at the task. especially given the huge number of possible variables external to the driver that woud have to be considered as part of any computation. [ not just what is happening but also what is not happening around the driver]
Not only do we have to process all incoming light signals constantly as our field of vision shifts we have to compute all our senses simultaneously.
The brain is pretty good I must admit but hey even though it is a miracle in itself it aint that miraculous.
Drive and manage the Autonomic functions of the body and brain , compute all light and sensory data constantly recalculating and interpreting...think about teh past and future .sheesh!!! no wonder I am tired after getting home from work....ha.
Question: How many neurons are needed to change a light bulb?
May be some one should try to work out how many ziga-bytes processors would be needed to just deal with light info alone then multipy that to accomodate all the other senses and then work out the same for predictive and memory fuctions....not to mention creative aspects such as improvisation.
I think you will find that it would be not only impossible for the human to function normally but that it would be a gross ignorance of oscas razor to think that evolution would be so stupid and inefficient. [ given the infinite nature of all those variables ]
I did an exercise once trying to work out the most efficient way of designing a collective of pseudo humanoid robots [non- self creative rigid programing and randomness functions] in a fixed environment and the amount of processing needed was astonomical if each robots internal information was kept isolated from the other. As soon as each robot had insight into the others state and position from with in the other robot via radio waves the amount of processing required dropped hugely to the point of practicable application even using todays Information technology.
I'll see if I can dig up the files and post later