Originally posted by jps
Making education free does not make it uncompetitive. Saying that everyone has the right to an education is not the same as saying everyone has the right to be succesfull in getting whatever degree they want, just that they have the right to try.
Weeding people out based on how much money their family has in no way gives a univesity a "competitive edge" and does not constitute a "talent elimination system"
You are obviously clueless about real life. When you make higher education free you jeoperdize it's quality, because you eleminate all private funding. When it's publically funded, the government governs and dictates how the university behaves and the students and their needs and concerns are flushed down the toilet. In a private university, the university take the students in account in every move and could care less about the government. Also, it's competetive, because Universities can compete in being better so that they attract better students. If they are getting annual checks from the government, then what is the motivation in being better.....
Professors would become government employees with pension, they would have no motivation to publish or do research....how beautifull ...huh....there goes the education.