The Michelson Morley experiment conclusions are an example of Occam's razor. If we don't observe an ether wind as you call it, then there could indeed be an ether that just so happens to move in the same way as the Earth. It shouldn't take you too much thought to realise how unlikely that is - It would have to move with the Earth rotationally, around the sun and in whatever overall direction in which the sun was going. That is tantamount to saying the Earth is some special object in the universe, which is against every scientific discovery that has been made since the birth of science.
Occam's razor states that the simplest explanation for a result is probably the correct one so we could either have a horrifically complicated comoving ether (which would probably be ruled out by observations of space, although I can't be bothered to think about this too much) or we conclude that the ether does not exist.
I would like to repeat my criticism of your air gun analogy as well. A burst of air from an air gun does not have a good particle interpretation. It is a pulse that expands in all directions in it's rest frame and eventually dissipates. Particles that we observe do not do that. From the point of view of the person firing the gun, the pulse will move at some overall velocity whilst at the same time expanding and dissipating.
You should read up on some details of the scientific method, because judging from this thread you are an extremely poor scientist.
Occam's razor states that the simplest explanation for a result is probably the correct one so we could either have a horrifically complicated comoving ether (which would probably be ruled out by observations of space, although I can't be bothered to think about this too much) or we conclude that the ether does not exist.
I would like to repeat my criticism of your air gun analogy as well. A burst of air from an air gun does not have a good particle interpretation. It is a pulse that expands in all directions in it's rest frame and eventually dissipates. Particles that we observe do not do that. From the point of view of the person firing the gun, the pulse will move at some overall velocity whilst at the same time expanding and dissipating.
You should read up on some details of the scientific method, because judging from this thread you are an extremely poor scientist.