Does time exist?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Important note:

With the post 1583 I have abandoned the idea of becoming-time duality by equating becoming with time. Heraclitus has been the first philochron in history.
 
My question about time-travel is this? If someone says something to me, and then returns and the next time allows time to play as it would naturally, am I the only one aware of what was said? ☺
 
My question about time-travel is this? If someone says something to me, and then returns and the next time allows time to play as it would naturally, am I the only one aware of what was said? ☺
If that were the case, it would not be time travel.
 
PHILOCHRONY VS TECHNOLOGY

Technology has demonstrated that:
a) time is relative,
b) in Quantum physics, time passes in two directions and
c) the definition of the second using an atomic clock.

Philochrony, using a simple hourglass or clepsydra, has proven that:
a) time and duration exist and
b) duration is magnitive.
 
TIME AND PROFESSION

In poetry, time is an illusion, a dream.
In Psychology, time is subjective, an emotion.
In Economy time is money.
In Physics, time is a measure, a number.
In Computing, time is virtual.
In Philosophy time is a priori.
In Philochrony, time is real, and is defined as the continuous succession of irreversible moments.
Its magnitude is the duration.
 
AN EDITION

BEFORE


B-T%2Bdiagram.png


AFTER

Diagram%2Bof%2Btime.png
 
Time is not a physical magnitude in and of its self .

Time can only change when the object is given a change in momentum , more or less than what the object was given .
 
Time is the singular of times. I bet this is the first time each and every one of you have been "here." ☺
 
Last edited:
Time is the singular of times. I bet this is the first time each and every one of you have been "here."
Yes, this is the first instant in time in which I have experienced this instant in time - but that's not a very useful concept.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top