Does time exist?

Status
Not open for further replies.
False.

The Solar system has travelled a light year around the galaxy's centre, and it has taken considerably longer than a year to do it. Because (plainly) it is not moving at the speed of light.

ie. a light year is a fixed distance no matter how fast or slow you traverse it.


This isn't really a debate. A light year is a unit of distance. It is not a unit of time. Full stop.

Based on the velocity of light .
 
A light year is a distance but it is also a velocity
Noooooooo

A light year is a measurement
Only a measurement
Nothing but a measurement
Has always been a measurement
Never been or even pretended to be anything else than a measurement

Light has velocity ✓
Light year measurement ✓
Light measurement X
Light year velocity X

This isn't really a debate. A light year is a unit of distance. It is not a unit of time. Full stop.



Next

:)
 
Noooooooo

A light year is a measurement
Only a measurement
Nothing but a measurement
Has always been a measurement
Never been or even pretended to be anything else than a measurement

Light has velocity ✓
Light year measurement ✓
Light measurement X
Light year velocity X





Next

:)

Light measurement ? What does that even mean ?

Light year velocity ? What does that even mean ?
 
Can't the speed of light be measured using trigonometry? Triangles etc. This is something I wondered about: if a (moving) mirror reflected light even faster, does this create a laser?

A light year is the distance light travels in a year.
 
Can't the speed of light be measured using trigonometry? Triangles etc. This is something I wondered about: if a (moving) mirror reflected light even faster, does this create a laser?

A light year is the distance light travels in a year.

NO

Correct. Qualifier a defined year

Please direct any further inquires to Professor Google

:)
 
NO

Correct. Qualifier a defined year

Please direct any further inquires to Professor Google

:)
light year
ˈlīt ˈˌyi(ə)r/
noun
ASTRONOMY
  1. a unit of astronomical distance equivalent to the distance that light travels in one year, which is 9.4607 × 1012 km (nearly 6 trillion miles).
    • informal
      a long distance or great amount.
      "the new range puts them light years ahead of the competition"
 
False.

The Solar system has travelled a light year around the galaxy's centre, and it has taken considerably longer than a year to do it. Because (plainly) it is not moving at the speed of light.

ie. a light year is a fixed distance no matter how fast or slow you traverse it.


This isn't really a debate. A light year is a unit of distance. It is not a unit of time. Full stop.
Light travels distance X in one year and
is called a light year

The solar system does not travel at light speed and cannot travel a light year at light speed so is just a velocity.


A distance is a distance and a ly is a light year, there would be no need to call a distance a light year unless it was based on light.
 
Light travels distance X in one year and
is called a light year

The solar system does not travel at light speed and cannot travel a light year at light speed so is just a velocity.


A distance is a distance and a ly is a light year, there would be no need to call a distance a light year unless it was based on light.

Your right

The thing is , most of us know this already
 
light year
ˈlīt ˈˌyi(ə)r/
noun
ASTRONOMY
  1. a unit of astronomical distance equivalent to the distance that light travels in one year, which is 9.4607 × 1012 km (nearly 6 trillion miles).
    • informal
      a long distance or great amount.
      "the new range puts them light years ahead of the competition"
Correct of course

A light year is the distance light travels in a year.

Which is what counter posted

I only fine tuned it to the extent of making it a defined year. As everyone should know the Earth year varies as do all planarity years

Light travels distance X in one year andi iscalled a light year

The DISTANCE is called a light year. And X is always the SAME

Astronomers use light years as a short hand method to express extremely large distances between bodies in the Universe which have vast distances between them

The solar system does not travel at light speed and cannot travel a light year at light speed so is just a velocity.

No one made a claim the solar system travels at the speed of light. If they did they are incorrect

****

The Solar System is traveling at an average speed of 828,000 km/h (230 km/s) or 514,000 mph (143 mi/s) within its trajectory around the galactic center,[3] a speed at which an object could circumnavigate the Earth's equator in 2 minutes and 54 seconds; that speed corresponds to approximately one 1300th of the speed of light.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galactic_year

The Sun orbits the galaxy in 225 to 250 million years

https://www.quora.com/How-many-times-has-our-solar-system-orbited-the-galaxy

And as noted in the link, solar system has been around the Galaxy about 18 to 20 times

****
A distance is a distance and a ly is a light year, there would be no need to call a distance a light year unless it was based on light.

As I have noted already

Astronomers use light years as a short hand method to express extremely large distances between bodies in the Universe which have vast distances between them

So that is the need

I guess they used light because it travels a lot further in a year than snails do

So snail years would be a a stupidly large number

:)
 
Light travels distance X in one year and
is called a light year
Correct. That DISTANCE is called a light year.


The solar system does not travel at light speed and cannot travel a light year at light speed
Correct.

so is just a velocity.
Incorrect.

A distance is a distance, not a velocity.

A distance is a distance and a ly is a light year,
Correct.
And a mile is a mile, not a mile-per-hour.

there would be no need to call a distance a light year unless it was based on light.
It is called a light year because it is the distance it takes light to travel in one year.
DISTANCE.
It's a distance.

A light year is still a light year even if you traverse it at one mile per hour.
 
A distance is a distance, not a velocity.

Which is contradictory to saying a light year.

1ly is equal to the time it takes for light to travel vector x , 1 ly is a vector , I was wrong it is not a distance or a velocity , it is a vector .

vector
ˈvɛktə/
noun
  1. 1.
    MATHEMATICSPHYSICS
    a quantity having direction as well as magnitude, especially as determining the position of one point in space relative to another.
 
Which is contradictory to saying a light year
No.

1ly is equal to the time it takes for light to travel vector x
No. 1LY is the DISTANCE covered by light in one year.

1 ly is a vector , I was wrong it is not a distance or a velocity , it is a vector
vector
ˈvɛktə/
noun
  1. 1.
    MATHEMATICSPHYSICS
    a quantity having direction as well as magnitude, especially as determining the position of one point in space relative to another.
Thus showing that the light year is NOT a vector since no direction specified.
 
Which is contradictory to saying a light year.
A mistake a lot of naive people make.

A light year is a distance.
At the speed of light, it takes one year to traverse it.
At 1 mile per hour, it takes 671 million years.

1ly is equal to the time it takes for light to travel vector x , 1 ly is a vector , I was wrong it is not a distance or a velocity , it is a vector .

vector
ˈvɛktə/
noun
  1. 1.
    MATHEMATICSPHYSICS
    a quantity having direction as well as magnitude, especially as determining the position of one point in space relative to another.

Oh for Pete's sake, you don't even know what a vector is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top