Your idea of TIME it reduced to the idea of AGE.
If time does not exist, as you think, neither does age.
Your idea of TIME it reduced to the idea of AGE.
If time does not exist, as you think, neither does age.
I don't get how this is a useful idea.Time does not exist
Time does not flow
Time does not have any direction
Only NOW exist
The PAST does not exist
The FUTURE does not exist
I don't get how this is a useful idea.
It is trivial to point out that time has indeed passed since you wrote the post I am now quoting (~48 hours, in fact).
I think the best you can claim is that you and I as humans can only experience time as this instant called "now". But that in no way implies that time doesn't exist.
(Kind of like saying that - since I only experience the train I am on - there is no such thing as the tracks the train runs on.)
Certainly. Right after you send me a box of inches.I extend to you the same challenge I have extended to others
Please send me as much or as little, your choice, part of this time you claim exist
however it is not TIME which has PASSED
The situation is that EVERYTHING since I began my post and you began quoting my post has AGED ~48 hours
Certainly. Right after you send me a box of inches.
By what rationale do you assert this?
How can you measure the velocity of a moving car without time? Surely, it's velocity is not dependent on its aging.
'Time in physics is unambiguously operationally defined as "what a clock reads".'
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time
Time is a measure of duration , of anything .
Think of being outside this Universe , literaly . And looking upon this Universe then from without . So that you are looking into this Universe , you are an observer , of the whole of the Universes , movements .
When you do this , you can see and feel , all kinds of movement between things , from galaxies to the subatomic . You see the Universe as a whole , or holistic .
Then you understand the equality of the measurement of time based on duration , anywhere in this Universe .
You see and feel every movement in this Universe at the same moment , and in any moment , past , now and in the future .
I think this is where you're equivocating.Truely your inch has never been seen
...
No one has seen ANY component of time
I think, when you say "X doesn't exist", what you mean is "X is not a discrete physical object".
Just because something is not experienced in a touchable way does not mean it doesn't "exist".
The emotion "anger" can't be shrink-wrapped, yet it certainly exists.
I could some up with a nigh-infinite list of the things that exist, yet can't be delivered by mail.
So, gravity, hatred, poverty, love, inches, width, dreams, doubt, enthusiasm - all don't "exist".Just because something is not experienced in a touchable way does not mean it doesn't "exist".
Sorry yes it does
So, gravity, hatred, poverty, love, inches, width, dreams, doubt, enthusiasm - all don't "exist".
It's not like that provides any deep insight into our world.
This really comes down to an equivocation of the word 'exist'.From your list
Some exist
Some do not
I will let you work out which are which
Well, it's just that the enthusiasm and persistence of your assertion seems to suggest you see some insight there, instead of a mere play on words.I was not aware I was expected to provide deep insights into the world sorry
Well, it's just that the enthusiasm and persistence of your assertion seems to suggest you see some insight there, instead of a mere play on words.