I've read a interview with Joël de Rosnay, tabout origin of life as a logic consequence of the formation of planets with the certain characteristics. He also said something in the sense that may viruses had been something else before and then they've found a way to don't need to do the hard work of reproducing themselves. I guess that was there also where I first saw this thing about the possibility of the common chemical ancestry of chlorophyl and hemoglobin.
Anyway, I've downloaded the article on PNAS, and searched for "preced*", and "cellular", and I found nothing about viruses preceding cellular life. The only related thing I found was:
Found already in the
abstract, although I've searched in the entire PDF for these terms. Maybe this thing of preceding cellular life is expressed in a more indirect way, making impossible to find by these terms, or maybe was simply an error of "The Scientist"....
Before this search I thought that the explanation of viruses preceding cellular life has something to do with alternative theories of origins of life, those that don't need replicators, some with metabolism preceding reproduction or something, and this kind of stuff. But that didn't help anyway because I don't know them more deeply than this short description.