Did Jesus really resurrected?

Saint

Saint

Valued Senior Member
Did he?
Logically possible or not?

Why not the Son of God chose to get burried for 6 months till the body rotten fully and then resurrected with brand new body, this will be more convincing of his supernatural power, right?
Or, he get cremated into ashes, and the ashes can combine by itself to form a new immortal body.

If I were God, I will decide to do more marvellous miracle than 3-day resurrection. ;)

Finally, what is the odds of believing Jesus resurrected?
The probability is higher than hitting a 6/49 lottery?
 
Saint said:
Did he?
Logically possible or not?

Why not the Son of God chose to get burried for 6 months till the body rotten fully and then resurrected with brand new body, this will be more convincing of his supernatural power, right?
Click to expand...

Why? People today who do not believe in the resurrection of Jesus would still not believe in the resurrection if the biblical story had him in the grave for 6 months. Actually they would be less likely to believe it.

Or, he get cremated into ashes, and the ashes can combine by itself to form a new immortal body.

If I were God, I will decide to do more marvellous miracle than 3-day resurrection. ;)
Click to expand...

For the people who saw it there was no need for anything more dramatic than 3 days.

Finally, what is the odds of believing Jesus resurrected?
The probability is higher than hitting a 6/49 lottery?
Click to expand...

There is no probability factors. Jesus was either resurrected from the dead or He was not resurrected from the dead.


All Praise The Ancient Of Days
 
There is no evidence he did. And if he did so what? It means the alleged sacrifice wasn't really a sacrifice.
 
spidergoat said:
There is no evidence he did. And if he did so what? It means the alleged sacrifice wasn't really a sacrifice.
Click to expand...



What evidence do we need ? do I believe Jerusalem was destroyed in 65 ad and the Jews were not permitted to live in Palestine. Is there evidence to thos facts . If you believe that , then you should believe what the apostles have said. :)
 
If you believe that there once lived a man named Jesus, then you should believe the bible in a literal sense.
 
yaracuy said:
What evidence do we need ?
Click to expand...
None, if you're prepared to admit that you're ridiculously gullible.

do I believe Jerusalem was destroyed in 65 ad and the Jews were not permitted to live in Palestine. Is there evidence to thos facts . If you believe that , then you should believe what the apostles have said. :)
Click to expand...
65 AD? :shrug:
And what does that have to do with the veracity (or otherwise) of the rest of the bible?
Because you think that any book that includes at least one fact must be entirely factual throughout?
By this "logic" Winnie the Pooh is a biographical/ historical treatise. :rolleyes:
 
Dywyddyr said:
None, if you're prepared to admit that you're ridiculously gullible.


65 AD? :shrug:
And what does that have to do with the veracity (or otherwise) of the rest of the bible?
Because you think that any book that includes at least one fact must be entirely factual throughout?
By this "logic" Winnie the Pooh is a biographical/ historical treatise. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...


I don't know how much you believe or know history, but your first paragraph indicate you should read more history.


I give some facts, but you instead to think about them you just strike them down.

The next question to you is, when Christianity, Nazarine, or the Way started ? and the teaching of Christianity by whom started, and were there followers of His teaching , Was His teaching about be truthful ?:)
Were his followers witnesses of His resurrection ?
 
yaracuy said:
I don't know how much you believe or know history, but your first paragraph indicate you should read more history.
Click to expand...
So you're assuming that his resurrection is history?
History is based on evidence. Which you implied you didn't need. :shrug:

I give some facts, but you instead to think about them you just strike them down.
Click to expand...
What "facts"?

Were his followers witnesses of His resurrection ?
Click to expand...
They claimed to be. And these claims are unverified.
 
yaracuy said:
I don't know how much you believe or know history, but your first paragraph indicate you should read more history.
Click to expand...
Since most scholars agree that Mark, the oldest gospel, was written around 65 to 70 CE, then the inclusion of "current" events shouldn't be surprising.
 
Dywyddyr said:
So you're assuming that his resurrection is history?
History is based on evidence. Which you implied you didn't need. :shrug:


Do you believe emperor Constantine existed in about 3 rd century ?
////////////////////////////////////
What "facts"?

I don't know how do you establish a fact ?

////////////////////////////////
They claimed to be. And these claims are unverified.
Click to expand...

How do you verify something what have been established long time ago ?
 
YoYoPapaya said:
If you believe that there once lived a man named Jesus, then you should believe the bible in a literal sense.
Click to expand...

There is some small indication that there might have been someone from whom the Jesus character was based, but again, no conclusive evidence. But that is not the same thing as believing the legends were true.
 
spidergoat said:
There is some small indication that there might have been someone from whom the Jesus character was based, but again, no conclusive evidence. But that is not the same thing as believing the legends were true.
Click to expand...

I was obviously joking :)
 
spidergoat said:
There is some small indication that there might have been someone from whom the Jesus character was based, but again, no conclusive evidence. But that is not the same thing as believing the legends were true.
Click to expand...


Tell me Is there some evidence that Attila the Hun existed ?


Is there any evidence Anibal the son of Amilkar existed ?
 
Yea that's the problem with history. You have to rely on sources and use your brain (historians) to determeine whether a source is reliable or not.

Are there any history geeks around who have studied this stuff about a Jesus character?
 
yaracuy said:
What evidence do we need ? do I believe Jerusalem was destroyed in 65 ad and the Jews were not permitted to live in Palestine. Is there evidence to thos facts . If you believe that , then you should believe what the apostles have said. :)
Click to expand...

gmilam said:
Since most scholars agree that Mark, the oldest gospel, was written around 65 to 70 CE, then the inclusion of "current" events shouldn't be surprising.
Click to expand...

yaracuy said:
Could you kindly clarify this paragraph .:)
Click to expand...
If the gospel was written after the fact, then it's no miracle that the book "predicted" the event.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top