Did Consciousness cause the Big Bang?
''We tend to treat ourselves as being separate to the universe.
This line of thought is illogical because we inhabit bodies made
up of space, time, matter and energy... With this in mind, one
might even say, 'if we are made up of the stuff of the universe,
then we are somehow the universe itself.' We are then the wide
Cosmos observing Herself in all Her beautiful array of wonders.'
The opening conclusion might indeed seem strange, for how can consciousness cause the big bang? Before we answer this question (if it can at all be answered intuitively), consider the following quantum facts: You know, the universe has a nature which is mind-like. In fact, observation alone creates the thing being observed. If this is true, then we have a particular premise to make here. The universe is observer-dependant. The universe would be meaningless without an observer there, not only to define reality, but to create reality (1)
(1) There are many ways we can create the universe in quantum physics, from changing the statistical variables of a photons path, to possible resolutions defining the big bang.
In fact, we tend to ask, 'If the universe requires us to create it, how did the universe form a few chronons after big bang?'
The answer to this question seems very strange indeed. It turns out that the answer is that we are creating the early universe right now! Try not to dismiss such an idea, because we are being told by top physicists that this is exactly what we should be believing! If this is true, then the mixed state (1) of the universe just a moment after big bang is being determined today through our observations.
But to all of this i add a twist. Perhaps the universe arose in a mixed state, but only one of these states would be the most probable. But what caused this probability to peak above the rest? My answer is again, consciousness... I shall explain how this might be possible.
Vedantic belief is that only one mind ever existed. If this is true, then all minds must make up one single field of consciousness (2). Now, imagine this field of consciousness. Where does it exist? Does it arise from matter?
This last question might be misleading. Perhaps physicists shouldn't be asking whether mind arises from matter... But instead how matter arises from mind. Treating the mind/consciousness as a force that doesn't originate from matter, must lead one to believe it flows throughout the universe. In fact, this is exactly what i believe. Then, if this is true, how does mind inhabit these corporeal shells of materiality? What causes individuality?
For a while now, the theory of consciousness has come under some interesting developments, such as physicist and mathematician Roger Penrose's belief that gravity in mediation with microtubules (located in the brain as cells), causes consciousness. The use of gravity has revolutionized our ways of understanding the causes of consciousness.
Before this, the force thought to govern the senses was the electromagnetic force, pushing electrons to and fro our brains. All of this may still be true today, as we must consider the particles in our heads as determining the way we think and feel. Here i make a contention. What if electromagnetism snapped the unified field of consciousness?
Electrons follow Fermi-Dirac Statistics (3), meaning that all electrons inside of my head will cancel each other out in harmony. For instance, consider two electrons inside an atom. If one of these electrons has a spin up, the other must have a spin down, that is unless one of these electrons are in a lower state of energy. Likewise, an electron cannot fall into a lower state of energy unless its spin is in an opposite direction. All fermion particles must cancel each other out in this manor, or they would fall back into the vacuum from whence they came. Though, just think about it. What if this cancellation causes individuality inherent in every human being? What if the electromagnetic forces at work causes the illusion of independence?
(3) – It, I feel is important to incorporate electromagnetic fields as a possible solution to ‘’snapping’’ the unified mind. It might just be, that the same electromagnetic influences proposed to give rise to consciousness inside the brain, is analogous to the universal mind being separated into individual beings.
And, how did we exist before we became independent?
Well you might think, independence comes to us, possibly in the womb, when those electrical signals shatter the great sea unto which we all came from. But from a relativistic outlook, we have all separated simultaneously, even if we are born at different times, months or years.
But before we became independent, we must have existed without independent thought, and it is because of this, we cannot remember our existences, before we became entrapped within our mortal coils. The sea of thought, dreams and hopes, the sea which made up one single mind, can only be interpreted in light of a God, or perhaps Plato’s World of Idea’s, Roger Penrose reminds us.
Dr. Fred A. Wolf, a leading pioneer in the field of consciousness also ascribes this force as the Mind of God. Only, i am not sure whether he ascribes this God as having independent thought.
I believe it does; but God cannot have independent thought anymore, that is until we return to our source, and activate The Great One all over again - of course, this depends on what you choose to believe. Though we will all return to our source through death one day, whether it be millions of years into the future - maybe even billions, and combine back into that one single mind.
Now, the zero-point energy field (also called the false vacuum) plays a big part in our conscious states today; as the theory goes. The effects of the zero-point energy field on matter was found by Paul Dirac, in his mathematical analysis of the electron in 1928. Binding relativity and quantum mechanics together, he found that the electron moved at lightspeed following a zig-zagged path through space, causing the illusion that electrons moved much slower. It turned out that the zero-point energy field was filled with potential negative spinning particles which buffeted the electron about, causing it to move in a zig-zagged path through space.
Now, Dr. Shiuji Inomata at the Ministry of International Trade and Industry Electrotechnical Laboratory in Japan believes that thoughts and feelings arise from the zero-point energy field, just as it is responsible for the appearance of matter. And here i make a contention. Perhaps emotions and thoughts are constantly being bombarded as well by the negative energy of the vacuum, just as it affects a tiny electron on its path through space and time. This may seem strange, since thought's and feelings are ethereal... but one must see this in light of the ethereal nature of the false vacuum; and if thoughts arise from this vacuum, then perhaps there are still correlations occurring, just as found with an electron being influenced by a negative particle in the false vacuum.
If consciousness does not arise from matter, for me it must have arisen at the big bang, from the opening where the false energy spewed forth. Consciousness must have flooded spacetime with information just as the big bang was occurring - because it was at this point a big crunch was also occurring.
Thus, consciousness came from the future and also came from the past (1), defining the reality that was chosen today. In fact, consciousness, if we treat it as an energy that streams from big bang, may have even caused the big bang to happen; there is no grander picture than to say the universe expanded solely for us. Indeed, if that is too hard to believe, just imagine that the one particular state of spacetime chosen, was in fact influenced by consciousness, so it could inhabit material bodies - simply so that we could exist. Moreover, if consciousness chose the conditions today for us to exist in, then we might answer the question to why our universe had such a low state of entropy in the beginning, allowing us today to determine a past and future, sandwiching the present time. Fantasy? Maybe. But life is a bit of a fantasy anyway.
(1) – even though this may seem highly philosophical, for any type of story, there must be an end, and with that into account, relativity does say that everything is somehow predetermined: And with this in mind, then if consciousness existed in some type of substate totally imaginal, then it must stream from big bang itself.(2)
(2) – in fact, the Late Astrophysicist, Fred Hoyle also believed that signals of some kind of intelligence where coming from the past, and this is akin to my theory of consciousness flowing in from both Alpha and Omega, and they somehow ‘’agree’’ in the present.
Let's examine this fantasy of spacetime. 15,000 million years ago, spacetime suddenly appeared. In the standard model of cosmology (the big bang), this happened for no reason at all. And stranger still, is that absolutely nothing existed before this point! How can this be? Today, the world we see around us, is [believed] to be something; and if this world is something, existence before the big bang must be the opposite of something - which is of course absolutely nothing. But how can something arise from nothing?
I've asked this question many times, and I’ve answered such a question by saying that this nothingness was actually everything needed to create the universe today. And if existence before the big bang indicated everything needed, then this must indicate that reality today would need to be the opposite of everything - and that is nothing... In fact, the world we are living in is a bit of an illusion mathematically. If you add up all the energy in the universe, you have absolutely nothing.
All of matter and energy in existence all comes to the big goose egg. That old proverb, 'life is but a dream,' may indeed be more than just a metaphor. Look at it this way. When the universe reaches the value of Ω the omega point - and when everything is finally dragged back into the gravitational singularity whence everything came, it will be as if we never existed at all; would it do us good now to say we ever did?
It’s pointless to assume a theory of physics, without philosophy or metaphysics. If we do, then there are area’s of physics which cannot be speculated on, or progressed on without the thoughts of philosophy and metaphysics, sciences unto their own.
The long-age questions that baffle cosmology, may be the very questions that help solve the mysteries of quantum mechanics.
''We tend to treat ourselves as being separate to the universe.
This line of thought is illogical because we inhabit bodies made
up of space, time, matter and energy... With this in mind, one
might even say, 'if we are made up of the stuff of the universe,
then we are somehow the universe itself.' We are then the wide
Cosmos observing Herself in all Her beautiful array of wonders.'
The opening conclusion might indeed seem strange, for how can consciousness cause the big bang? Before we answer this question (if it can at all be answered intuitively), consider the following quantum facts: You know, the universe has a nature which is mind-like. In fact, observation alone creates the thing being observed. If this is true, then we have a particular premise to make here. The universe is observer-dependant. The universe would be meaningless without an observer there, not only to define reality, but to create reality (1)
(1) There are many ways we can create the universe in quantum physics, from changing the statistical variables of a photons path, to possible resolutions defining the big bang.
In fact, we tend to ask, 'If the universe requires us to create it, how did the universe form a few chronons after big bang?'
The answer to this question seems very strange indeed. It turns out that the answer is that we are creating the early universe right now! Try not to dismiss such an idea, because we are being told by top physicists that this is exactly what we should be believing! If this is true, then the mixed state (1) of the universe just a moment after big bang is being determined today through our observations.
But to all of this i add a twist. Perhaps the universe arose in a mixed state, but only one of these states would be the most probable. But what caused this probability to peak above the rest? My answer is again, consciousness... I shall explain how this might be possible.
Vedantic belief is that only one mind ever existed. If this is true, then all minds must make up one single field of consciousness (2). Now, imagine this field of consciousness. Where does it exist? Does it arise from matter?
This last question might be misleading. Perhaps physicists shouldn't be asking whether mind arises from matter... But instead how matter arises from mind. Treating the mind/consciousness as a force that doesn't originate from matter, must lead one to believe it flows throughout the universe. In fact, this is exactly what i believe. Then, if this is true, how does mind inhabit these corporeal shells of materiality? What causes individuality?
For a while now, the theory of consciousness has come under some interesting developments, such as physicist and mathematician Roger Penrose's belief that gravity in mediation with microtubules (located in the brain as cells), causes consciousness. The use of gravity has revolutionized our ways of understanding the causes of consciousness.
Before this, the force thought to govern the senses was the electromagnetic force, pushing electrons to and fro our brains. All of this may still be true today, as we must consider the particles in our heads as determining the way we think and feel. Here i make a contention. What if electromagnetism snapped the unified field of consciousness?
Electrons follow Fermi-Dirac Statistics (3), meaning that all electrons inside of my head will cancel each other out in harmony. For instance, consider two electrons inside an atom. If one of these electrons has a spin up, the other must have a spin down, that is unless one of these electrons are in a lower state of energy. Likewise, an electron cannot fall into a lower state of energy unless its spin is in an opposite direction. All fermion particles must cancel each other out in this manor, or they would fall back into the vacuum from whence they came. Though, just think about it. What if this cancellation causes individuality inherent in every human being? What if the electromagnetic forces at work causes the illusion of independence?
(3) – It, I feel is important to incorporate electromagnetic fields as a possible solution to ‘’snapping’’ the unified mind. It might just be, that the same electromagnetic influences proposed to give rise to consciousness inside the brain, is analogous to the universal mind being separated into individual beings.
And, how did we exist before we became independent?
Well you might think, independence comes to us, possibly in the womb, when those electrical signals shatter the great sea unto which we all came from. But from a relativistic outlook, we have all separated simultaneously, even if we are born at different times, months or years.
But before we became independent, we must have existed without independent thought, and it is because of this, we cannot remember our existences, before we became entrapped within our mortal coils. The sea of thought, dreams and hopes, the sea which made up one single mind, can only be interpreted in light of a God, or perhaps Plato’s World of Idea’s, Roger Penrose reminds us.
Dr. Fred A. Wolf, a leading pioneer in the field of consciousness also ascribes this force as the Mind of God. Only, i am not sure whether he ascribes this God as having independent thought.
I believe it does; but God cannot have independent thought anymore, that is until we return to our source, and activate The Great One all over again - of course, this depends on what you choose to believe. Though we will all return to our source through death one day, whether it be millions of years into the future - maybe even billions, and combine back into that one single mind.
Now, the zero-point energy field (also called the false vacuum) plays a big part in our conscious states today; as the theory goes. The effects of the zero-point energy field on matter was found by Paul Dirac, in his mathematical analysis of the electron in 1928. Binding relativity and quantum mechanics together, he found that the electron moved at lightspeed following a zig-zagged path through space, causing the illusion that electrons moved much slower. It turned out that the zero-point energy field was filled with potential negative spinning particles which buffeted the electron about, causing it to move in a zig-zagged path through space.
Now, Dr. Shiuji Inomata at the Ministry of International Trade and Industry Electrotechnical Laboratory in Japan believes that thoughts and feelings arise from the zero-point energy field, just as it is responsible for the appearance of matter. And here i make a contention. Perhaps emotions and thoughts are constantly being bombarded as well by the negative energy of the vacuum, just as it affects a tiny electron on its path through space and time. This may seem strange, since thought's and feelings are ethereal... but one must see this in light of the ethereal nature of the false vacuum; and if thoughts arise from this vacuum, then perhaps there are still correlations occurring, just as found with an electron being influenced by a negative particle in the false vacuum.
If consciousness does not arise from matter, for me it must have arisen at the big bang, from the opening where the false energy spewed forth. Consciousness must have flooded spacetime with information just as the big bang was occurring - because it was at this point a big crunch was also occurring.
Thus, consciousness came from the future and also came from the past (1), defining the reality that was chosen today. In fact, consciousness, if we treat it as an energy that streams from big bang, may have even caused the big bang to happen; there is no grander picture than to say the universe expanded solely for us. Indeed, if that is too hard to believe, just imagine that the one particular state of spacetime chosen, was in fact influenced by consciousness, so it could inhabit material bodies - simply so that we could exist. Moreover, if consciousness chose the conditions today for us to exist in, then we might answer the question to why our universe had such a low state of entropy in the beginning, allowing us today to determine a past and future, sandwiching the present time. Fantasy? Maybe. But life is a bit of a fantasy anyway.
(1) – even though this may seem highly philosophical, for any type of story, there must be an end, and with that into account, relativity does say that everything is somehow predetermined: And with this in mind, then if consciousness existed in some type of substate totally imaginal, then it must stream from big bang itself.(2)
(2) – in fact, the Late Astrophysicist, Fred Hoyle also believed that signals of some kind of intelligence where coming from the past, and this is akin to my theory of consciousness flowing in from both Alpha and Omega, and they somehow ‘’agree’’ in the present.
Let's examine this fantasy of spacetime. 15,000 million years ago, spacetime suddenly appeared. In the standard model of cosmology (the big bang), this happened for no reason at all. And stranger still, is that absolutely nothing existed before this point! How can this be? Today, the world we see around us, is [believed] to be something; and if this world is something, existence before the big bang must be the opposite of something - which is of course absolutely nothing. But how can something arise from nothing?
I've asked this question many times, and I’ve answered such a question by saying that this nothingness was actually everything needed to create the universe today. And if existence before the big bang indicated everything needed, then this must indicate that reality today would need to be the opposite of everything - and that is nothing... In fact, the world we are living in is a bit of an illusion mathematically. If you add up all the energy in the universe, you have absolutely nothing.
All of matter and energy in existence all comes to the big goose egg. That old proverb, 'life is but a dream,' may indeed be more than just a metaphor. Look at it this way. When the universe reaches the value of Ω the omega point - and when everything is finally dragged back into the gravitational singularity whence everything came, it will be as if we never existed at all; would it do us good now to say we ever did?
It’s pointless to assume a theory of physics, without philosophy or metaphysics. If we do, then there are area’s of physics which cannot be speculated on, or progressed on without the thoughts of philosophy and metaphysics, sciences unto their own.
The long-age questions that baffle cosmology, may be the very questions that help solve the mysteries of quantum mechanics.