leopold,
The last time you read anything new on evolution was 1983 or something, wasn't it?
lessee, i think goulds treatise on spandrels was published after that.
goulds bio was published after that. (ever wonder if he HAD to die?)
your assertion is not quite correct james.
I've just finished reading Neil Shubin's book Your inner fish. It outlines, for the non-specialist reader, a whole heap of the actual data that shows that you, leopold, are descended from a fish-like creature (and from jellyfish, and tube worms etc.)
a whole heap of actual data?
some people are damned good writers.
some can take you anywhere.
explain these gaps.
what gaps.
the ones mentioned in the article.
the very same ones dr. ayala was reffering to.
but wait, arrowsmith says he didn't say it because ayala told him so.
so, why does ayala bitch and moan to arrowsmith but not to science?
what the fuck is up with all of that james?
we hear NOTHING from science in the way of any kind of errata.
even when science makes a plea for everyone to calm down (the atheists)*, it STILL doesn't mention ayala and the alledged hoopla.
so, what's the story here james?
Do yourself a favour. Go to your local bookshop and get a copy. Or pick one up online. You really need an education, and this isn't a bad place to start.
i really need an education.
listen to you.
it amazes me how you can sit there and not let the implications of this bother you.
Right. Evolution has moved on quite a bit since Mendel. See, for example, the above book, which details many recent discoveries.
thats right, and i wonder how much evolutionists depend on that very connection.
* in her book "the greatest story never told", lana (the author) refers to a group of people called saganites.
they might be one and the same.