Supposition.Answer: On this earth, life was created by a designer(s).
Another supposition.DNA is made from a biological machine language. It's impossible for this language to have been made naturally.
Supposition.Answer: On this earth, life was created by a designer(s).
Another supposition.DNA is made from a biological machine language. It's impossible for this language to have been made naturally.
Supposition.
Another supposition.
I doubt it.I could say the same thing following a run down of your side of the argument
Keep trying. It's not a "brush-off", simply pointing out that despite your seeming certainty those answers were anything but.but I realize that would be an unfair tactic. These one word brush-offs seem to be your specialty though.
Answer: On this earth, life was created by a designer(s).
peer reviewed evidence please.Answer: On this earth, life was created by a designer(s).
Answer: On this earth, life was created by a designer(s).
What invalidates that currently is if you use the argument: Who made you?
Technically it was biological process between your mother and father, but they didn't exactly sit there with a draft board and draw up the schematics that you are made from. (As handy as that would have been)
Instead it was left to the roll of a dice, at least that's the simplified term to express "The planets were aligned, the mood was right, the chemistry was euphoric and the eventual result seeded you you."
Definition of THEORYevolution is just a theory
I could say the same thing following a run down of your side of the argument, but I realize that would be an unfair tactic. These one word brush-offs seem to be your specialty though.
Answer: On this earth, life was created by a designer(s).
DNA is made from a biological machine language. It's impossible for this language to have been made naturally. The language that DNA adheres to would have to had come first, in it's complete form, before even the first life appeared. But language is not a physical thing, it's an abstract idea. Abstract ideas can only exist in a mind.
It's because everyone on this website except a few poorly educated people like yourself are aware of the massive evidence that supports the theory. If you haven't reached the minimal level of knowledge to understand the arguments, there's nothing to be done with you except dismissal.I could say the same thing following a run down of your side of the argument, but I realize that would be an unfair tactic. These one word brush-offs seem to be your specialty though.
Yes what are you saying and why?... The boundary condition of the membrane gives evolution a logical direction. This goes against the dogma. ... Do you really want to understand?
You're overlooking the fine print in the Second Law that says "in the long run." After all, a steady, monotonic increase in entropy would be a predictable pattern and that, in itself, would violate entropy, right?The problem I can see for others is entropy is usually defined as being random resulting in waste. If you reverse entropy we get the opposite which is order and efficiency. If life started with only the boundary condition (cation pumps), the rest will fall into place since it defines an equilibrium.
You're overlooking the fine print in the Second Law that says "in the long run." After all, a steady, monotonic increase in entropy would be a predictable pattern and that, in itself, would violate entropy, right?
How does the segregation of K+ and Na+ cause the cell membrane to exist in a state of lower entropy?The membrane of the cell is induced into lower entropy because sodium and potassium cations are segregated across the membrane due to the expenditure of energy
It is often defined as this, but this is a oversimplified and misleading definition. Entropy is disorder in a system, not waste. Localized order can spontaneously come from a disordered system with the application of energy, and without life:entropy is usually defined as being random resulting in waste
Agreed. Local decrease in disorder (inside the cell) though maintaining an overall increase in entropy in the system. This expenditure of energy is maintained through either photosynthesis, chemosynthesis, or consumption of food (which in turn came from photo- or chemo synthesis). The source of the energy increases in disorder at a higher rate than life reduces disorder, as the conversion to usable energy results in a certain amount of inefficiency and loss to heat.The cell needs to constantly expend energy to maintain this contrary entropy situation, because it's induction goes in the opposite direction of the universe.
The environment isn't 'try'ing to do anything, in that it does not have a goal or purpose. I do agree that it applies pressure to increase entropy via natural forces though. Why is the boundary condition the definition of low entropy, and I assume you're referring to the cell membrane? Why is this entropy increase being considered as transported, and why are you calling it 'food value'? Why will cellular membrane transport systems evolve into a low-entropy method?The environment will try to add disorder to the membrane such as material input for internal transport. Because the boundary condition defines low entropy, even the transport of this entropy increase (food value) into the cell will evolve into a low entropy way; specific transport proteins.
How did we get here? I'm with you on the rough measure of disorder being lowered for the water itself via the addition of the sodium (though not inherently lowering entropy in general via this action).The bulk water is at higher energy and higher entropy.
This can also be resolved by the sodium diffusing into the general water column and away from the membrane.This dual potential can be lowered if dissolved organics in the bulk water were to diffuse out of the bulk water into the external membrane water.
This is really where you are losing me. Even if this gradient you describe is causing organic molecules to 'fall' towards the cell membrane at a rate faster than would be normal without the existence of life, how does that alter either rate of genomic change or external survival pressures such as predation - and in turn, hasten evolution?This can quicken evolution.