I have an extremely limited scope of knowledge in biology my field is engineering. Yet my own understanding far exceeds zero so I'll assume you are making a relative statement. However in order to answer that I'd have to know what you were contradicting. I have no context for your perceived logical fallacy with exception of a quote excerpt from my post made in generalities, no context of a specific form, no context specific for superiority. You make assumptions on those means with no introduction, and no context...I could not begin to understand from where your perceptions draws.
But congratulations on inserting yourself into the conversion if that's what you wanted.
So from my position your statement is confusing. You say at "least a million genetic differences" but there are only 20,000-something genes in humans.
Since no mammal reproduces asexually I wonder if you knew we were speaking of complex life forms, (thus the word superior) River-wind just used a bacterial example to make a point.
Then you say "it surely will" in reference to a probability of superior life form when we have no direct observable facts to prove..."surely will".
Thus you should know of my quote... but the combination of billions of organic systems working in concert to create a superior form is against probability. ... was a general statement of the accumulation of traits from abiogenesis to homosapien (simple to complex) on the unlikely hood from beginning of the Earth to current and untraceable lineage of coincidences that are required to reach human complexity. Specifically not just the progression of evolution through advanced forms of life but the creation of these organic systems to work in concert. We may look at the combination of 500 million years of life as eventual human outcome but most of the complex forms of life appeared very suddenly with no ancestry. It's one thing to speak about adaption as an evolutionary process that can do remarkable work, it's another to jump to the snowball theory (which doesn't even work for the snowball). Many species exist for millions of years with no accumulation to extinction...accumulation is obviously not a given.
But congratulations on inserting yourself into the conversion if that's what you wanted.
So from my position your statement is confusing. You say at "least a million genetic differences" but there are only 20,000-something genes in humans.
Since no mammal reproduces asexually I wonder if you knew we were speaking of complex life forms, (thus the word superior) River-wind just used a bacterial example to make a point.
Then you say "it surely will" in reference to a probability of superior life form when we have no direct observable facts to prove..."surely will".
Thus you should know of my quote... but the combination of billions of organic systems working in concert to create a superior form is against probability. ... was a general statement of the accumulation of traits from abiogenesis to homosapien (simple to complex) on the unlikely hood from beginning of the Earth to current and untraceable lineage of coincidences that are required to reach human complexity. Specifically not just the progression of evolution through advanced forms of life but the creation of these organic systems to work in concert. We may look at the combination of 500 million years of life as eventual human outcome but most of the complex forms of life appeared very suddenly with no ancestry. It's one thing to speak about adaption as an evolutionary process that can do remarkable work, it's another to jump to the snowball theory (which doesn't even work for the snowball). Many species exist for millions of years with no accumulation to extinction...accumulation is obviously not a given.