"Seed factor" is a term that is only used by you. It is unscientific nonsense.
Unscientific nonsense: one who cannot see how a seed from a nominated host duality is the factor responsible for repro. Please give a better word understood by ancient and present generations. If you have trouble, try banging head on your desk with force.
There's no program for speciation.
LOL! You also denied the word seed appeared in Genesis, I showed you it was not only included in the text but pivotally contexted in the reproduction process of life forms - which planet are you from? The text says a land based life form group [kind; specie] shall follow its own land based group [the text]. That, FYI, is speciation, and the first recording of it. What did you think it means!?
This was previously proven wrong to you. Did you forget?
It was denied, not proven. Please tell us the first listing of life form group divisions?
These categories are taxonomically meaningless, as I previously explained to you.
Its not meaningless but exactly what is says. There is more than one way to categorise life form group divisions than skeletal and dna. The first threshold is by terrain habitat. One cannot expect words like dna in an ancient text [ugh!], but the principle is scientific and not meaningless. The first vew of these divisions is what we observe: some life forms only live in the ocean! Their dna imprints are merely later, more in-depth observances, and the latter cannot be arrived at without the former coming first. Its not meaningless but one of the greatest statements in science: you won't find anything of equivaence any place else.
Nature is out your window. Go look at it. Open your eyes. It isn't in your bible.
I looked. No old man with a white beard. How many colors does nature come in and did it exist on day one of this planet? Does nature exist on Mars? FYI, nature is just a placebo for the inexplicable and not to be taken literally. A few generations back, nature meant act of God, or random and involuntary occurences. The placebo is discarded when we find out an underlying cause, like gravity replacing nature.
Stupid straw man. Darwin didn't even know about cars. They weren't invented.
He must have known of the principle: observing how a car works does not negate the car maker - it affirms it. This is all that happened with Darwin, and it became a big splash after he died for those who were disillussioned with their beliefs. But it is unscientific to conclude a complexity occurs without a complex program behind it; or that a programmer does not apply. That is not science!
No. A program involves information and instructions. Atoms contain no instructions.
Yes, the variables of electronic orbits is what makes one atom group different from another, and that constitutes both its inherent information and instruction. What did you think makes one atom [of gas] varied from another [of iron] - the environment?
Meaningless religious gibberish.
Nothing to do with religion. You believe the environment makes your eye an eye, I see this resultant from data contained in the seed transmitted by the host to the offspring. Both are non-religious premises, only mine is right. It is easily proven: lets see an eye where there is no transmission from the host! If the environment predated life, then how come there were no eyes around?
You still don't know the difference between space and time, do you?
How did you work that out - you have access to the KGB?
Dinosaurs were warm-blooded. They did not become lizards.
That is not a score with me. I made only a cursory example of large animals adapting to smaller ones.
So "seed factor" is your name for "atom", is it? Why do you need a new name for something that already has a name?
I don't need a new name. What I said was, the word seed was an approproate ancient term for the underlying source of an entity. It denotes essence, core, chip. Try to come up wth a better one!
