>.> I guess I'd rather not argue with the anti-evolution people. I just wish that they'd be still swinging from one tree to another.
How about just swinging from a single tree?>.> I guess I'd rather not argue with the anti-evolution people. I just wish that they'd be still swinging from one tree to another.
How about just swinging from a single tree?
One feathered wing proves that there were winged creatures, it says nothing about any transition from one creature to another ...regardless of some biologist's "guess/prediction".
I agree. This topic is enough of a nightmare for us. So much so that we took the unusual step of confining it to its own little ghetto. There are plenty of genuinely antiscientific people who come here and spout faith and fallacies that we have to spend bandwidth responding to, but at least they do it sincerely. Max just gets a kick out of pissing people off. I could almost forgive him if he was a know-it-all teenager, but he's about my age and he should be helping to keep this place in order like a good elder. He's like the cranky old uncle that you have to invite to Thanksgiving dinner but he always starts spouting off and ruining it.My attitude is that Baron Max has had his voice. Well and truly. Now he is simply parroting the same re-hashed stuff with each post. His last few posts have simply boiled down to "evolution is just a theory". That sort of nonsense has been dealt with ad nauseam. I don’t see the value of wasting any more bandwidth re-explaining then re-explaining then re-explaining the scientific method to him over and over again. He doesn’t want to listen; he doesn’t want to learn. And, my assessment is that he is trolling. He is goading people with posts that are designed to wind people up. That most certainly is against the rules.
I got effectively booted out of The Science Forum for a much more restrained moderator outburst after much more intense provocation. Do you think your comments were wise?
I agree. This topic is enough of a nightmare for us. So much so that we took the unusual step of confining it to its own little ghetto. There are plenty of genuinely antiscientific people who come here and spout faith and fallacies that we have to spend bandwidth responding to, but at least they do it sincerely. Max just gets a kick out of pissing people off. I could almost forgive him if he was a know-it-all teenager, but he's about my age and he should be helping to keep this place in order like a good elder. He's like the cranky old uncle that you have to invite to Thanksgiving dinner but he always starts spouting off and ruining it.
It's a shame. Whenever there's a discussion about the two or three things that he actually knows something about, he's very articulate and reasonable and a good contributor.
Note the qualifier effectively. Certain behaviours patterns are offensive to me. I may return later this year in Coberst mode.Funny, everyone there thought you left in a huff and were asking you to come back, even me. :shrug:
Do you mean rabbits?bible according to them hipety hopety folk.
I may return later this year in Coberst mode.
I doubt it will be much funfor observers. I shall simply post a series of opinionated observations that are either scatty, or blindingly obvious, then refuse to engage any other poster in meaningful dialogue. It seems to make him happy, so it might work for others.Ah, mums the word, then. Look forward to the fun.
No. See mod's post 315. If he posts, his post are quickly deleted. A great error IMHO for the good of the thread.Has Max given up on this thread? ...