stRgrL,
***And no she did not take responsibility for her actions, claiming she didnt know what she was doing, that isnt taking responsibility.***
As far as I know, Andrea Yates never claimed that she didn't know what she was doing. What she did was motivated by her insane knowledge that Satan was closing in to do eternal harm to her children and what she is claiming is that she thought it was the right thing to do. Why? Because she's insane. Therefore, the defense rightfully argued that she was not guilty by reason of insanity which is a valid legal defense.
***I dont care WHAT circumstance Im in, I would NEVER kill my child.***
So, trapped in the bathroom with your five children, you'd feel more comfortable watching each of them suffer the torment and pain of being burned alive? You'd stand there and do nothing as you watched the skin melt off their bodies while they screamed in agony from the excrutiating pain? Have you ever seen ANYONE burned alive? Believe me, unless you are heartless, if you saw someone getting burned alive and had the means to put them out of their misery, you would.
***What if your husband killed your kids? Would you think differently then?***
Andrea Yates had a long history of severe mental illness. She had previously expressed both her fear that Satan was coming for the children and her thoughts that she was considering killing them rather than allowing Satan to take them. Had she been my spouse, I would not have left my children with her unsupervised. I would have made sure that someone sane was there to help.
If it were my spouse who was insane and had expressed such fears and thoughts - and I left my children unsupervised - and they ended up being killed by my insane spouse, then yes, I would think differently. I would think that my insane spouse should be put in a mental institution and treated for their illness. I would also think that I should be the one to go to prison because I was the sane one who knowingly and negligently put my children in harms way, causing their death.