Einstein refers to the fact dynamical mass is a frame dependent quantity. Physicists don't use it, they use rest mass and momentum, using Einstein's formula of $$E^{2} = m^{2}+p^{2}$$ where m is the rest mass.
velocity is not energy.
otherwise there would be no rest mass relevantly speaking
So your whining is based on ignorance.
not whinning....
the only thing you will see me whine about is the complacent ignorance of the so called self proclaimed educated.
is there really ever rest mass? NO!
so where is the error? Guys like you who can't admit it.
Did it get published? Did it get rejected by everyone you submitted it to?
not in the form you share but directly sent and if you can find one of them, keep it; as it will shut you up
Who exactly is 'seeing it' now?
No one other than the few i send material to every day as well as the locations i have visited throughout the country and world.
Was the 'thesis' less than 50 pages and devoid of maths? A thesis is between 100 and 400 pages typically and the culmination of 3~7 years work.
not concerned with 'norm'...... and it was completed in less than 3 months as the math was already done, understood and being used to combine understanding to form
i.e.... the molecular interactions of neural exchanges. IN which to address molecular interactions in a mathematical frame was complete non-sense to anyone in biology or physics at that time; as the form breaks every rule of current paradigm
What you're almost certainly referring to is a paper and one which was considered nonsense by mainstream physicists. You complain they didn't understand it but in actual fact they thought it was nonsense. And here you are, 25 years later, and you're still a nobody whining on forums about how you've got all the answers but you don't actually know anything.
yep..... non-sense to even you now
all because of limited exposure to natural phenomenon coupled with integrity
so in these last 25 years, more data has been accumulated perfecting what it real; not the paradigm of beliefs in created items such as dark matter to correct the ignorance of entropic math
simply to retain certain benchmarks as law, is to ruin the ability to comprehend what is true
i.e..... gravity is entangled energy between mass; not some stupid constant
to mathematically represent this comes from combining mass, energy and time (the trinity) to a script
and i have no reason to prove anything to you nor publish and release in the form you wish or are accumstomed too. Many have before and regretted it based on the exact methodology you hold so dear. Not interested in releasing the power of math to irresponsible morons just to be accepted
like i said the data to understand what is being said is all over the globe; but you want to answer questions like:
why does mercury's orbit do what it does? Go back to kepler and then realize your momentum is not the missing variable but the energy between the mass (entanglement) is the missing comprehension; i.e.... the orientation is to another body; you get to guess which as i am not interested in this.
as well; the eclipse or bending of light behind the sun; is not because of gravity bending space; have you ever seen a mirage; then energy from the sun is doing it not the bending of space
when you start reading from more than your own beliefs of accepted paradigm, then maybe you can begin
i.e..... if 2 atoms are combined by energy, what it that energy? not sometimes but everytime, what is energy itself upon mass?
if an atom is BEC cold at rest what is the form that changes its state?
there is only ONE answer; then return to the planck and combine 2 systems based on that recognition of what energy is; it doesn't work.
there is no method of combining two like systems to represent; the combined energy between them is greater than the addition of the 2 separately
alpha; when you want to answer questions that benefit mankind then i will consider you making a choice to support the evolution of knowledge
but all you want is your name in print and that is how you gauge what is good by who get's the most recognition and acceptance.
Einstein himself knew the work was unfinished; what is so hard for people to realize the errors must be in the benchmarks?
Walking the Planck drowns everyone eventually and that planck was built from the 2nd law, when the first law alone shares how the system of the second must be missing something.
change is norm; chaos is for morons
