Crop Circle Analysis - Where Does The Soil Radiation Come From?

[phlogistician]

But you keep forgetting that you're still a 'nobody' whilst the report was commissioned and then performed by a highly qualified scientific team. You're personal opinion is irrelevant and which even a layman can see is close to ridiculous.c

Which peer reviewed journal was that 'paper' published in please? Because if you go to the top level of the web server that 'paper' is hosted on, well, it's _not_ an academic press site now is it?

So, you disagree with my hypothesis that you would expect increased radioactivity in plant matter because it absorbs minerals via it's roots from the surrounding area, and C02 from the atmosphere would you? Interesting. What part of that don't you understand? Why do you think we can carbon date organic matter? Hmm?

Can you try and think for once?

 

[common_sense_seeker]

Which peer reviewed journal was that 'paper' published in please? Because if you go to the top level of the web server that 'paper' is hosted on, well, it's _not_ an academic press site now is it?

So, you disagree with my hypothesis that you would expect increased radioactivity in plant matter because it absorbs minerals via it's roots from the surrounding area, and C02 from the atmosphere would you? Interesting. What part of that don't you understand? Why do you think we can carbon date organic matter? Hmm?

Can you try and think for once?

Y-a-w-n.

 

[phlogistician]

Y-a-w-n.

I'll take that as an admission of defeat.

 

[AlphaNumeric]

But you keep forgetting that you're still a 'nobody' whilst the report was commissioned and then performed by a highly qualified scientific team. You're personal opinion is irrelevant and which even a layman can see is close to ridiculous.c

I find it amazing you can say that and not see the hypocrisy. You have regularly ignored the mainstream, both in terms of published work and people on these forums who know more than you. You claim to have evidence of a 'giant Hyrax' and you link to, literally, a hick website about some guy living in a swamp who saw some stuff decades ago. When asked to explain why such creatures are entirely absent from the fossil record and leave zero sign of their existence, ie asked where the scientific evidence is, you couldn't give a good answer.

Your argument is massively hypocritical. And furthermore using the "These people know more than you" argument is flawed. If you accepted the argument from authority then you wouldn't argue with the mainstream so why are you trying to use an argument you yourself don't accept?

If you just support your position with evidence and reason then you have no good reason to hold the views you do. Saying 'yawn' is just a cop out.