If I'm not mistaken he lied to her in order to get her to have sex with him, is that correct..? That is not a cool thing to do. I don't think it's worthy of prosecution, but it is not a cool thing to do.
Lying to get someone to have sex with you - more to the point - saying you're single and not disclosing that you are in fact an Arab - that should not be tantamount to
rape.
We aren't talking about this guy being charged with fraud here. But
rape. I am not sure about the Israeli legal system, but if this were to occur in the US or Australia, for example (if our legal system imploded and allowed such a charge to stand and the judges were zombies and found him guilty), he would end up on the sex offenders list.
What we have is a woman who approached a guy on the street, they chatted each other up and went to a quiet spot (apparently an abandoned building) and had sex. In short, they went and had a quick fuck and then went their own way. How the courts could construe that as her desire to start a relationship, I still don't know. But to say that his being an Arab somehow went against the sanctity of her body and soul.. Err what?
Signal said:
It is a legal matter when someone, in good faith, agrees to a transaction, and it later turns out that the other party deceived them. This is a standard pattern for fraud.
How was she deceived that it qualified as a rape? He was an Arab and therefore she and the Israeli legal system considers it to be rape? But if he was Jewish it would not be rape?
We're not talking about buying a car that turns out to be a lemon here. We are talking about two adults consenting to have sex and then one crying rape because the other was an Arab and the legal system allowing her to do it. The DA agreed that the act of sex was consensual. But because he was an Arab and did not disclose that to her - because one has to disclose one's religion and nationality to not be a rapist in Israel - the court has found that he raped her.
Let me put it this way. Lets say you move to Israel. Meet a girl and after a few weeks, you tell her you love her so she'd have sex with you. You don't really love her, but it's been a few weeks and you think 'meh what the hell'. A month or so later you separate and she realises you didn't love her and she goes to the police and says you raped her because she had sex with you because she thought you loved her, but you did not.
Doreen said:
To respect her there is to say that one's racism is a valid criterion that needs to be protected by the law.
Bingo!
You've hit the nail on the head.
This case is basically a validation of racism. And it was done with this one line:
"If she had not thought the accused was a Jewish bachelor interested in a serious relationship, she would not have co-operated."