I agree; those were not very nice things heyuhua said about you.
Do I see a poor attempt on your part to create friction?
You're free to interpret it any way you want, but it was not meant as an attempt to create friction at all.
I have simply stated that as a moderator, James has to ensure mainstream accepted science in science section,
Which is not true: it's not the "mainstream science" subsection, it's the "science" subsection. There are many threads there about speculative science and science that is not mainstream at all. And how long did it take this thread to be moved? Are you suggesting that James R has been slacking off?
where is the hint of any conspiracy accusations from my side in this?
Perhaps it's a language issue, but you appeared to say that James R is somehow forced by some external entity to do what he did. You literally said: "James R has a job to do, he has to appear as maintaining mainstream content in science section,"
Or you are goading James to get into some kind of unsavory exchange with me?
No, but if you want to avoid that possibility, I think it's best not to talk about him in what could (hopefully wrongly!) be interpreted as negative or accusatory ways.
Sure, I don't know if you have Master's in Astrophysics.
But my dear friend, the higher education (of astrophysics) is not reflected in your posts.
How would you be able to judge? As I've already explained, that Ricci tensor definition difference is so small, it's very possible to miss or forget it, even if one has formal training in the field. So is there anything else in my posts that doesn't reflect it?
I don't understand why you've all of a sudden taken an interest in all this, but thanks for the tip. But now that this thread is in the subsection where it belongs, I shall.