Your record shows that any participation in any debate/conversation/argument with you is impossible.
My condolences in return my old friend.
Chemical evolution:
- Thread starter paddoboy
- Start date
My condolences in return my old friend.
Write4U
Valued Senior Member
And you are wrong in that assertion.
Self-organization
Self-organization, also called (in the social sciences) spontaneous order, is a process where some form of overall order arises from local interactions between parts of an initially disordered system. The process can be spontaneous when sufficient energy is available, not needing control by any external agent. It is often triggered by seemingly random
fluctuations, amplified by positive feedback. The resulting organization is wholly decentralized, distributed over all the components of the system. As such, the organization is typically robust and able to survive or self-repair substantial perturbation. Chaos theory discusses self-organization in terms of islands of predictability in a sea of chaotic unpredictability. [/quote]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-organization#
Last edited:
https://www.nature.com/subjects/ori...gin of life,led to early replicator molecules.
Chemical origin of life
The chemical origin of life refers to the conditions that might have existed and therefore promoted the first replicating life forms. It considers the physical and chemical reactions that could have led to early replicator molecules.
Latest Research and Reviews
Research
23 November 2020 | Open Access
Prebiotically-relevant low polyion multivalency can improve functionality of membraneless compartments
Short cationic peptides and nucleotides can form complex coacervates, but the influence of reduced multivalency…more
Site-specific RNA methylation by a methyltransferase ribozyme
A methyltransferase ribozyme, along with the small-molecule cofactor O6-methylguanine, is shown to catalyse the… more.....
Research
27 October 2020 | Open Access
Impact of wet-dry cycling on the phase behavior and compartmentalization properties of complex coacervates
Chemical origin of life
The chemical origin of life refers to the conditions that might have existed and therefore promoted the first replicating life forms. It considers the physical and chemical reactions that could have led to early replicator molecules.
Latest Research and Reviews
Research
23 November 2020 | Open Access
Prebiotically-relevant low polyion multivalency can improve functionality of membraneless compartmentsShort cationic peptides and nucleotides can form complex coacervates, but the influence of reduced multivalency…more
Site-specific RNA methylation by a methyltransferase ribozyme
A methyltransferase ribozyme, along with the small-molecule cofactor O6-methylguanine, is shown to catalyse the… more.....
Research
27 October 2020 | Open Access
Impact of wet-dry cycling on the phase behavior and compartmentalization properties of complex coacervatesWet-dry cycling is thought to have enabled the production of molecular building blocks of life. Here, the authors… more.....
Harnessing chemical energy for the activation and joining of prebiotic building blocks
Life requires a constant supply of energy, but the energy sources that drove the transition from prebiotic…more.....
Mineral-mediated carbohydrate synthesis by mechanical forces in a primordial geochemical setting
Formose chemistry has been proposed as a prebiotic route to carbohydrates, but simple mechanisms that impart…more....
Prebiotic oligomerization and self-assembly of structurally diverse xenobiological monomers
Harnessing chemical energy for the activation and joining of prebiotic building blocks
Life requires a constant supply of energy, but the energy sources that drove the transition from prebiotic…more.....
Mineral-mediated carbohydrate synthesis by mechanical forces in a primordial geochemical settingFormose chemistry has been proposed as a prebiotic route to carbohydrates, but simple mechanisms that impart…more....
Prebiotic oligomerization and self-assembly of structurally diverse xenobiological monomers
Please provide evidence supporting your claim that I am "wrong in that assertion".
Last edited:
Write4U
Valued Senior Member
See above.
Everything in our life has only mathematical patterns.
How can it be that mathematics, being after all a product of human thought which is independent of experience, is so admirably appropriate to the objects of reality?
Albert Einstein…
https://medium.com/however-mathemat...fe-has-only-mathematical-patterns-504a0e87ab3
Last edited:
There is nothing to "See above" that supports your claim that I am "wrong in that assertion".
Like paddoboy, you are simply Trolling, Write4U,
Trolling meaning refuting your mystical inferences.
https://socratic.org/questions/is-t...e theory of,develop into different life forms.
Is there a connection between abiogenesis and evolution?
Biology Origin of Life on Earth Abiogenesis
1 Answer
Alan P.
Apr 21, 2016
Abiogenesis is the theory of how life could develop from non-living materials. Evolution is the theory of how existing life could develop into different life forms.
Explanation:
Both abiogenesis and evolution deal with the development of new life forms. The difference is in the starting conditions.
Write4U
Valued Senior Member
Self-organization is all you need to know.
OK, see #125.
And of course you will refuse to provide any Direct Quotes of any Posts authored by me making any "mystical inferences".
Trolling meaning refuting your mystical inferences.
Again, paddoboy, you are simply Trolling...Casting Aspersions...your usual MO.
I have supplied all quotes. and again, I'll let records and our peers speak for anything else. Take it easy old friend!!
My Post #62 : "If you understand abiogenesis so clearly, then why are you compelled to introduce "evolution" into the equation?
You seem to be conflating an unexplained hypothesis, abiogenesis - life from non-life, and an actual scientific theory that begins with the premise that life already exists."
Would you please point out the "mystical inferences" in my Post #62 quoted above?
Would you please reference the Post #'s where you "supplied all quotes"?
My Post #62 is the only Post I made in this Thread until you began TROLLING me with your Post #70 where you Cast Aspersions by stating : "In actual fact, it appears to be you...conflating the unsupported myth of ID with the logic of extrapolation back to the obvious...Abiogenesis."
???
Shakes Head
Last edited:
I didn't say that. I understand it enough along with other science to realise its the only scientific explanation for the emergence of life. Conflating again dmoe?
This thread is entitled "chemical evolution.
As per my link, I'm pointing out an obvious connection and refuting your silly conflation.
Already done...
And I was correct and spot on, but if you believe I am trolling
report me.dmoe - one doesn't have to believe the bible as Holy Writ to realize there are wise words here and there in it. Most apt here at SF and concerning one inveterate slanderer/troll in particular: Proverbs 29:9
...shakes head more...???I didn't say that. I understand it enough along with other science to realise its the only scientific explanation for the emergence of life. Conflating again dmoe?
This thread is entitled "chemical evolution.
As per my link, I'm pointing out an obvious connection and refuting your silly conflation.
Already done...
And I was correct and spot on, but if you believe I am trolling
My Post #62 was directed at Write4U, in response to his Post #60 - YOU KNOW THIS
Your Post #133 is complete nonsense - YOU KNOW THIS
You are simply TROLLING -YOU KNOW THIS
As per the links given and ignoring the provocative nonsense....
The chemical evolution of life, via Abiogenesis, is the only scientific answer we have.
We though are still not fully familiar with the exact pathway, but that does not invalidate the fact that Abiogenesis, [either locally inspired or Panspermia] is the only scientific answer.
Any hopeful, heart warming, myth of some form of ID, is just that and totally without scientific support or merit.
The adoration shown towards James Tour and the letters after his name, is offset by no other then his own questionable, silly statements [as already shown] of telling his "congregation, presumably to keep the faith so to speak] that even if any forthcoming evidence was discovered, supporting Abiogenesis, it would not shift him and his literal devotion to the bible and all that it claims.
That's about the state of play at this time.
The chemical evolution of life, via Abiogenesis, is the only scientific answer we have.
We though are still not fully familiar with the exact pathway, but that does not invalidate the fact that Abiogenesis, [either locally inspired or Panspermia] is the only scientific answer.
Any hopeful, heart warming, myth of some form of ID, is just that and totally without scientific support or merit.
The adoration shown towards James Tour and the letters after his name, is offset by no other then his own questionable, silly statements [as already shown] of telling his "congregation, presumably to keep the faith so to speak] that even if any forthcoming evidence was discovered, supporting Abiogenesis, it would not shift him and his literal devotion to the bible and all that it claims.
That's about the state of play at this time.
...hmm...
yeah, shakes head...
Sure there are! But are they divinely inspired words?
And that alone does not validate in anyone's language, a book written in an obscure age by obscure individuals, inspired by some magical deity, or whatever.
