Chaim Henry Tejman M. D., Wave Theory and the origin of life?

Do Dr. Chaim Tejman's theories seem to explain the origin of life?

  • No

    Votes: 3 75.0%
  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Perhaps what he explains is the origin of Intelligence???

    Votes: 1 25.0%

  • Total voters
    4
Why do you find this guy's theory to be so compelling rather than spending more time to learn the science that already exists but that you (apparently) haven't decided to learn? No one has ever heard of this guy and his "work" certainly hasn't influenced the scientific community.

You've mentioned that you are a janitor. What leads you to believe that you've identified a solution to a grand unified theory when those who are well informed in physics don't take this guy seriously?

I'm just curious as to your thinking process.

Because the "science" that already exists is based on FEAR of the inescapable logic that LIFE.... did not first originate in four dimensional space - time in organic forms based on the carbon molecule. It is so obvious any honest high school student could figure this out..... but a dishonest genius who is scared of the obvious truth to this will miss it........
We are not alone in this universe / multiverse.....


"It was not until 1920 that the idea of linking electromagnetism and
gravity resurfaced. At that time a new theory of gravitation had been proposed by Albert Einstein (1879-1955), called the general theory of relativity. It was a replacement of Newton's theory, which had stood unchallenged since 1687. Inspired by Einstein's work, a young German mathematician named Theodore Kaluza was seized by a curious idea. The theory of relativity links space an time together to form a four-dimensional space-time continuum. What would happen, mused Kaluza, if general relativity were formulated in five rather than four dimensions? This is what Kaluza did, and to everyone's astonishment it was discovered that five-dimensional gravity obeys the same laws as
four-dimensional gravity as well as Maxwell's laws for the electromagnetic field. In other words, gravitation and electromagnetism are automatically unified in five dimensions, where electromagnetism is merely a component of gravity!"


The only drawback of the theory concerns the extra dimension. Why
don't we see it?
An ingenious answer was provided by Oskar Klein. A
hosepipe viewed from afar looks like a wiggly line, i.e. one- dimensional.
However, on closer inspection it can be seen as a narrow tube. It is, in fact,
two-dimensional, and what was taken to be a point on the line is actually a
little circle going around the tube. In the same way, reasoned Klein, what we normally regard as a point in three dimensional space could in reality be a little circle going around a fourth space dimension. Thus Kaluza's extra
dimension might well exist, but be impossible to detect because it is closed
(circular) and rolled up to a very small circumference. In spite of
these bizarre overtones, it seems probable that in future a "theory of everything" will make use of the idea of unseen higher dimensions."
.
...

"Although nature manifests four distinct forces, physicists believe that
each may be part of a smaller number of more primitive forces. At high energy, the electromagnetic and weak forces appear to merge into a single "electroweak" force. Some "grand unified theories" suggest that a further amalgamation takes place between the electroweak and strong forces at as yet unattained energies. The most ambitious unification schemes envisage an amalgamation of all four forces into a single "superforce" at ultra-high levels of energy."...
"The real burden in the next three centuries will not be the development of fancy mathematics, but the experimental testing of these ambitious theories. All current thinking about total unification assumes that the effects of linking all the forces and particles together will only become manifest at energies that are some trillion times greater than those currently attainable in particle accelerators. Probably we shall never reach such energies directly" ( A Theory of Everything" Volume 21 of "The World of Science)




Intervention from life forms from those higher dimensions may well deserve some credit for keeping us out of a nuclear war or much more serious nuclear disaster over these past decades.

We are free to consider this to be good news!
https://www.near-death.com/religion/christianity/howard-storm.html#a04

Because of my fear of a nuclear holocaust I asked if there was going to be a nuclear war in the world, and they said no. That astonished me, and I gave them this extensive explanation of how I had lived under the threat of nuclear war. That was one of the reasons I was who I was. I figured, when I was in this life, that it was all sort of hopeless; the world was going to blow up anyway, and nothing made much sense. In that context I felt I could do what I wanted, since nothing mattered.



They said, "No, there isn't going to be any nuclear war."



I asked if they were absolutely sure there wasn't going to be nuclear war. They reassured me again, and I asked them how they could be so sure.



Their response was: "God loves the world." They told me that at the most, one or two nuclear weapons might go off accidentally, if they weren't destroyed, but there wouldn't be a nuclear war.



I then asked them how come there had been so many wars. They said that they allowed those few to happen, out of all the wars that humanity tried to start. Out of all the wars that humans tried to create, they allowed a few, to bring people to their senses and to stop them.

Science, technology, and other benefits, they told me, had been gifts bestowed on humanity by them - through inspiration. People had literally been led to those discoveries, many of which had later been perverted by humanity to use for its own destruction.

 
OK, but if you are a "mere janitor", why have you decided to follow the views of this eccentric nobody, rather than following science? Doesn't it make more sense to take on trust the verdict of the universities and the rest of the worldwide academic community, if you don't have the capacity to become expert in these topics yourself?

But curiously, this precis of Tejman (written in very poor English) asserts that, far from being a mere janitor, you are a professor of German Studies :eek: :

Doctoral: 1961 Jerusalem University of Medicine and Nature Sciences Like Planck-Einstein’s quantum open the door to modern physics 20 century; the same, seems be happen, with two semi loops, wave formations Tejman’s quantum, that open the door to 21 century modern physics and all natural sciences. After many years of exploring and research succeeded Tejman to connect between Darwin’s theories of life with all other disciplines of science. This connection he called “The United Nature Theory”, also known as Grand Unified Theory. Wave theory. The U.N.T. is an additional path of understand the ingenious sophisticated behavior of the “NATURE”. The first book of The United Nature Theory (Grand Unified Theory, Wave Theory, Theory of everything) was published by Chaim Tejman in 2001. Until today he published another nine books of the theory. The theory introduced that quantum formation is composed by two semi loops (+ and 0) double bubbles that give scientific solution to every natural formation. The best description of Tejman’s theory gave Dennis Tate, Professor of German Studies in the Department of European Studies & Modern Languages: “Dr. Chaim Tejman is one of the leading proponents of putting theoretical physics together with metaphysics to come up with a logical explanation for life as we known it”. The theory is now included curriculum together with I. Newton and A. Einstein works of many of universities. Tejman wrote 251 original papers.[ideas] and introduce 18 new equations to physic. U.N.T. is the first theory that united longstanding discussion between quantum mechanics and. Einstein’s ideas that every thing is composed by this same one quantum formation. The revolution’s ideas of United [Unified] Nature theory.

From: https://www.grandunifiedtheory.org.il/Boston.htm

That link also looks as if it is making a feeble attempt to impersonate Boston University - which is fraudulent, of course.

But interestingly, there actually is a Dennis Tate who is an emeritus Professor of German Studies, at Bath University: https://people.bath.ac.uk/mlsgdt/publications.htm

But how very odd that this Chaim Tejman, who nobody seems to have heard of and seems quite mad, should have been - supposedly- endorsed by a retired professor of a quite unrelated subject, at Bath.......who just happens to share a name with a "mere janitor" in Nova Scotia, who, quite by coincidence is the only person on the internet who is promoting Chaim Tejman.

I also see that you have been banging this drum of yours for Chaim Tejman "MD", for over a decade now: https://carbonbias.blogspot.com
That was posted in 2010.

There is, therefore, something extremely fishy about you, as well as about this Tejman person - assuming that you are not Tejman.

You are not levelling with us, I think. :wink:


It would be kind of challenging for me to fit all those German studies in with four political campaigns here in Nova Scotia?

My 2006, 2008, 2016 and 2004 campaign writings as ART.
 
Yeah. There in Nova Scotia. Near the Bay of Fundy. In Canada. And not in Israel, no , not at all.

I have to admit that Rabbi Alon Anava does have me questioning if my wife and I could fit in in Israel?????

We know that based on her mom's last name that she is Sephardic Jewish.
 
Why do you find this guy's theory to be so compelling rather than spending more time to learn the science that already exists but that you (apparently) haven't decided to learn? No one has ever heard of this guy and his "work" certainly hasn't influenced the scientific community.

You've mentioned that you are a janitor. What leads you to believe that you've identified a solution to a grand unified theory when those who are well informed in physics don't take this guy seriously?

I'm just curious as to your thinking process.

If you happen to have an extra ten minutes this video may help to answer your question......
I will now listen to it again for the third time today.........

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/is...s-in-microtubules.161187/page-95#post-3670726


Personally I look at this in a more materialistic way, but it appears that Roger Penrose believes that fundamentally everything rest on quantum mechanics.
 
I have definitely got to read all of this article........

https://www.interaliamag.org/articl...it-a-quantum-orchestra-tuned-to-the-universe/

Stuart Hameroff’s research involves a theory of consciousness developed over the past 20 years with eminent British physicist Sir Roger Penrose. Called ‘orchestrated objective reduction’ (‘Orch OR’), it suggests consciousness arises from quantum vibrations in protein polymers called microtubules inside the brain’s neurons, vibrations which interfere, ‘collapse’ and resonate across scale, control neuronal firings, generate consciousness, and connect ultimately to ‘deeper order’ ripples in spacetime geometry. Consciousness is more like music than computation.
 
Dennis:

You need to explain this:
But how very odd that this Chaim Tejman, who nobody seems to have heard of and seems quite mad, should have been - supposedly- endorsed by a retired professor of a quite unrelated subject, at Bath.......who just happens to share a name with a "mere janitor" in Nova Scotia, who, quite by coincidence is the only person on the internet who is promoting Chaim Tejman.
Is your sharing of the same name as the professor from Bath just a coincidence, or are you one and the same person?
Are you from Nova Scotia or from Bath?
If you are two different people, how did it come to be that you're both on the record as ardent supporters of this Chaim Tejman guy?
Are you Chaim Tejman?

You understand, I hope, that if the people here can't trust you, at least some of them (myself included) will be disinclined to waste time engaging with you?

I look forward to reading your explanations.
 
I look forward to reading your explanations.

ditto
though my suspicion is Dennis may choose to ignore the thread completely and post a new one purely based on past behavior.
Dennis is quite obviously very intelligent based on his threads
i wonder if he is distracted by something like a type of autism maybe(all the smartest people are on the spectrum[so science appears to prove consistently although i personally argue that to be a potential miss understanding of the increased complexity of the human mind & autism being like a genre of variance rather than an illness or disability])

it appears the smartest humans think in ways that simply defy common understanding and go considerably against social norms of allowable social interactive norms of compliance

cultural example
explain why
many Americans do not trust their government
get them to give examples that show them the government has broken their trust
like a person would
or
is it some type of religion/belief founded n urban myth culture or indoctrination etc.

there is a great deal to be lost driving science hard down a religious path
what i do notice is constant associations of advanced science theory being handed off to a religious authority figure,
which is commonly found in delusional psychosis
the nature of the delusion may be harmless and a functional aspect of cognitive function
vocalized it may not make any real sense except to the person who processes that way
and a blinding flash of genius may come out the other side like a magic food processor
but the delusion stands on its own.

everyone has delusions
they are a compulsory aspect of modern civilized life
the ego and self esteem could be argued to be delusions
additionally optimism as an advanced theory of human cognition may be classed as a mandatory delusion for species survival aspects

note those who protractedly demand everything be manifestly brutalized into a material animism of magic free cause and effect physicality tend to have very serious depression
and play that out as a sadistic game of abuse on others happiness and then call it "being real"

conversely the religious aspect seem to have been fueled into its own mental social philosophy

watching this pay out inside someone mind can be somewhat frustrating
creationism, conspiracy theory's, cults, religions, de-bunkers, sociopath skeptics ... etc ...
 
Last edited:
though my suspicion is Dennis may choose to ignore the thread completely and post a new one purely based on past behavior.
That would confirm that he is a troll. We'll see.

Dennis is quite obviously very intelligent based on his threads
I'm inclined to disagree, for a number of reasons. But his intelligence, or lack thereof, is actually kind of irrelevant.

If we are to take him at face value, we can only conclude that he has never developed any skills in critical thinking. He appears to be willing to accept just about any idea that he can manage to jam into his existing belief system. There's no evidence that he's able to distinguish science from religion, pseudoscience from science, anecdote from data, or reliable sources from suspicious ones. He appears to be completely incapable of spotting a fraudster, too.

If he's genuine, then in principle it should be possible to teach him something about critical thinking. However, it sounds like he might be older and too stuck in his ways to want to learn something new at this stage in his life.

i wonder if he is distracted by something like a type of autism maybe...
I'm unable to diagnose anything like that, based on his postings here. Not sure about you.

there is a great deal to be lost driving science hard down a religious path
what i do notice is constant associations of advanced science theory being handed off to a religious authority figure,...
That's similar to what I just said. If somebody doesn't have the toolkit to clearly separate religious notions from scientific ones, then the likelihood of getting lost in a religious mire becomes significantly greater. I don't think "delusional psychosis" - which you mention - is required.
 
I don't think "delusional psychosis" - which you mention - is required.

My 2 cents

Think the warn fuzzy feeling is strong within him

Unfortunately warm fuzzy feeling has not made it into any medical text book on Medical Dictionary

:)
 
Dennis:

You need to explain this:

Is your sharing of the same name as the professor from Bath just a coincidence, or are you one and the same person?
Are you from Nova Scotia or from Bath?
If you are two different people, how did it come to be that you're both on the record as ardent supporters of this Chaim Tejman guy?
Are you Chaim Tejman?

You understand, I hope, that if the people here can't trust you, at least some of them (myself included) will be disinclined to waste time engaging with you?

I look forward to reading your explanations.


I am not a Professor from Bath.....
I am a janitor at a school in Nova Scotia, Canada who reads a lot.

One of the only significant things that I accomplished so far is losing the 2006 Pictou Centre campaign!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pictou_Centre


2006 Nova Scotia general election
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Progressive ConservativePat Dunn3,90152.60
New Democratic PartyDanny MacGillivray2,34431.61
LiberalTroy MacCulloch1,05714.25
GreenSamuel M. Clark931.25–
IndependentDennis Tate200.27

I did teach English in Quito, Ecuador for over a year.... and yes... even at the university level.... but not because I had completed a degree but I got the job because English was my first language.

I taught at Universidad Technologica de Israel de Quito and I had my former students in mind as I wrote all of my four political campaigns that can be read if you do a search for this title:


"My 2006, 2008, 2016 and 2004 campaign writings as ART."


I had been hoping to arrange for side by side Spanish to English translation for my campaigns to grab the attention of my former students to inspire them to practice their English more.

I also am hoping to put this other theory in front of Canadians and others who are studying English as their second or third language.


"Would an intelligently financed UBI be dangerous for the environment?"
which is over on the political forum here on Sciforums.

I actually worked at forestry until about 1997 when lower back pain made it impossible for me to be productive enough at forestry. Then I worked as a gas station attendant for about seven years and since 2009 I've been a cleaner / janitor.
 
Last edited:
ditto
though my suspicion is Dennis may choose to ignore the thread completely and post a new one purely based on past behavior.
Dennis is quite obviously very intelligent based on his threads
i wonder if he is distracted by something like a type of autism maybe(all the smartest people are on the spectrum[so science appears to prove consistently although i personally argue that to be a potential miss understanding of the increased complexity of the human mind & autism being like a genre of variance rather than an illness or disability])

it appears the smartest humans think in ways that simply defy common understanding and go considerably against social norms of allowable social interactive norms of compliance

cultural example
explain why
many Americans do not trust their government
get them to give examples that show them the government has broken their trust
like a person would
or
is it some type of religion/belief founded n urban myth culture or indoctrination etc.

there is a great deal to be lost driving science hard down a religious path
what i do notice is constant associations of advanced science theory being handed off to a religious authority figure,
which is commonly found in delusional psychosis
the nature of the delusion may be harmless and a functional aspect of cognitive function
vocalized it may not make any real sense except to the person who processes that way
and a blinding flash of genius may come out the other side like a magic food processor
but the delusion stands on its own.

everyone has delusions
they are a compulsory aspect of modern civilized life
the ego and self esteem could be argued to be delusions
additionally optimism as an advanced theory of human cognition may be classed as a mandatory delusion for species survival aspects

note those who protractedly demand everything be manifestly brutalized into a material animism of magic free cause and effect physicality tend to have very serious depression
and play that out as a sadistic game of abuse on others happiness and then call it "being real"

conversely the religious aspect seem to have been fueled into its own mental social philosophy

watching this pay out inside someone mind can be somewhat frustrating
creationism, conspiracy theory's, cults, religions, de-bunkers, sociopath skeptics ... etc ...

My dad, Robert Stewart Tate was schizophrenic as well as manic depressive.....
and I gained empathy for his situation in 1988 to 1990 by taking a nutritional product invented by Karl Jurak
that was supposed to oxygenate the blood.

It was not until 1999 that some psychiatric nurses told me that I was likely having an adverse reaction to Matol and I should not take it any more
because they knew of six or more cases similar to mine. I had a rough decade from 1990 to 2000 while I was still taking Matol occasionally, not
knowing that it was causing a really strange reaction in me.......
that on at least one occasion......
had something like the out of body part of an NDE???????????????

I stopped taking Matol in 1999 and switched over to MSM as my main nutritional supplement....
and I have been basically "normal" since then. My gifted Ecuadorian Pentecostal wife has also been
amazingly helpful to me.

From 1988 to 1990 I had taken very high quantities of Matol because it greatly increased my level of energy but.......... after an episode something like the up side of the manic depressive cycle I at least began to clue that I should take less of it. I took too much of it again around 1995 and had a difficult couple of months.... then I took another bottle of it in 1999.. .and again another episode so I haven't touched a drop of it since 1999.
 
Dennis:

You need to explain this:

Is your sharing of the same name as the professor from Bath just a coincidence, or are you one and the same person?
Are you from Nova Scotia or from Bath?
If you are two different people, how did it come to be that you're both on the record as ardent supporters of this Chaim Tejman guy?
Are you Chaim Tejman?

You understand, I hope, that if the people here can't trust you, at least some of them (myself included) will be disinclined to waste time engaging with you?

I look forward to reading your explanations.


Here in the back woods of Central- Nova, N. S., Canada..... it would be extremely difficult for a professor who had spent a number of years teaching in Europe to manage to get MERELY FORTY ONE votes total.......... in four campaigns, three at the municipal level... and one as an independent at the provincial level! If I was qualified as a professor I would quite likely have won one of those four campaigns but...... alas... .I am a janitor / cleaner who reads a lot......
and it is a good thing that I feel a sense of accomplishment even from losing political campaigns!

My youtube video from back in 2010 indicates my fascination with high tide vs low tide levels and the aspects of climate change that relate to the threat of rising ocean levels. .... and thus... my fascination with Israeli mega-scale desalination technologies both solar / green and more conventional, (fuelled by natural gas or oil).



The Greening of the Sahara
 
Dennis:

Thank you for your posts. You sound plausibly real, which is a good thing. :)

One of my questions was this:
If you are two different people, how did it come to be that you're both on the record as ardent supporters of this Chaim Tejman guy?
Do you think that whoever it was who wrote about the Bath professor Dennis Tate's support of Chaim Tejman just got the two of mixed up by accident, then?
 
Speaking to the video, this is taking an already "crazy' idea which has been out there and making it even "crazier" or misunderstanding the original idea in the first place.

Dennis has the idea that flooding the desserts would reduce the water level in the oceans which is not what even the original idea was about. The people who put out the desalination of the dessert idea did so to reduce green house gasses by "greening" massive additional areas of Earth. This isn't likely to be feasible for many reasons but there is "some" logic there.

Doing it to directly reduce the water levels in the ocean makes no sense at all. Water flows back to the sea.

After watching the video I now think I've got a better insight into what Dennis is about. He reminds me of a guy that I knew. He had been in the Marines and after getting out went to school, where I met him.

He spoke with certainty and authority, even though he didn't know what he was talking about usually. We had a joint project once where we had to argue a case before a professor. We were graded individually and we each had a different portion of an argument. We each had to write our own portion of the brief and we each had to make an oral argument before the professor individually.

The topic was the same subject however and we both were able to discuss our approach beforehand. I got an A and he got a C+.

He tried to authoritatively BS and I did not. He actually looked quite a bit like Dennis, same hair type, facial mannerisms and acted (spoke) like Dennis.
 
Last edited:
Dennis:

Thank you for your posts. You sound plausibly real, which is a good thing. :)

One of my questions was this:

Do you think that whoever it was who wrote about the Bath professor Dennis Tate's support of Chaim Tejman just got the two of mixed up by accident, then?

More likely that the name Dennis Tate is fairly common and it just happened to work out that we are both interested in the writings of Dr. Chaim Tejman.
 
Speaking to the video, this is taking an already "crazy' idea which has been out there and making it even "crazier" or misunderstanding the original idea in the first place.

Dennis has the idea that flooding the desserts would reduce the water level in the oceans which is not what even the original idea was about. The people who put out the desalination of the dessert idea did so to reduce green house gasses by "greening" massive additional areas of Earth. This isn't likely to be feasible for many reasons but there is "some" logic there.

Doing it to directly reduce the water levels in the ocean makes no sense at all. Water flows back to the sea.

After watching the video I now think I've got a better insight into what Dennis is about. He reminds me of a guy that I knew. He had been in the Marines and after getting out went to school, where I met him.

He spoke with certainty and authority, even though he didn't know what he was talking about usually. We had a joint project once where we had to argue a case before a professor. We were graded individually and we each had a different portion of an argument. We each had to write our own portion of the brief and we each had to make an oral argument before the professor individually.

The topic was the same subject however and we both were able to discuss our approach beforehand. I got an A and he got a C+.

He tried to authoritatively BS and I did not. He actually looked quite a bit like Dennis, same hair type, facial mannerisms and acted (spoke) like Dennis.


On the other hand I am not the only person worried about the possibility of ocean levels perhaps rising much more rapidly than most experts predict. The West Antarctic Ice Sheet is partly below sea level and seems to be vulnerable to rapid cracking and sliding of chunks of ice if it were hit with something that would shake it up.


The "Unstable" West Antarctic Ice Sheet: A Primer

http://www.nasa.gov/jpl/news/antarctic-ice-sheet-20140512/#.VeOFcrR1qOw



https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090205142132.htm
Collapse Of Antarctic Ice Sheet Would Likely Put Washington, D.C. Largely Underwater
Date:
February 6, 2009
Source:
University of Toronto
Summary:
Geophysicists have shown that should the West Antarctic Ice Sheet collapse and melt in a warming world -- as many scientists are concerned it will -- it is the coastlines of North America and of nations in the southern Indian Ocean that will face the greatest threats from rising sea levels.

University of Toronto and Oregon State University geophysicists have shown that should the West Antarctic Ice Sheet collapse and melt in a warming world – as many scientists are concerned it will – it is the coastlines of North America and of nations in the southern Indian Ocean that will face the greatest threats from rising sea levels.

The catastrophic increase in sea level, already projected to average between 16 and 17 feet around the world, would be almost 21 feet in such places as Washington, D.C., scientists say, putting it largely underwater. Many coastal areas would be devastated. Much of Southern Florida would disappear, according to researchers at Oregon State University.

“There is widespread concern that the West Antarctic Ice Sheet may be prone to collapse, resulting in a rise in global sea levels,” says geophysicist Jerry X. Mitrovica, who, along with physics graduate student Natalya Gomez and Oregon State University geoscientist Peter Clark, are the authors of a new study to be published in the February 6 issue of the journal Science. “We’ve been able to calculate that not only will the rise in sea levels at most coastal sites be significantly higher than previously expected, but that the sea-level change will be highly variable around the globe,” adds Gomez.


There are many other technologies that could be useful in turning deserts green.....
and even the introduction of beavers to new territory could greatly decrease the speed at which rain flows back into the oceans. Trees and other vegetation are not only a carbon sink..... but they are a water sink as well.
 
More likely that the name Dennis Tate is fairly common and it just happened to work out that we are both interested in the writings of Dr. Chaim Tejman.
FAR more likely imo that you passed yourself off as a Bath professor in order to give 'Dr. Chaim Tejman' some level of credibility. No real professor would do so.
 
FAR more likely imo that you passed yourself off as a Bath professor in order to give 'Dr. Chaim Tejman' some level of credibility. No real professor would do so.

Thank you..... I guess I will take it as a compliment that you think that a janitor at a school.... could pass myself off as a Bath professor!?

I am tempted to get in contact with the guy now that I know that he shares my name and also is interested in Dr. Chaim Tejman.
 
Back
Top