This was Asden's first Post. No wonder he's cleared off.
btw Welcome!
btw Welcome!
*****.
We're supposed to believe that someone cannot find any credible scientific info on evolution? Yeah, right.
Mods, please delete this thread immediately. It is merely another opportunity for the resident ***** creationists to spew their shite.
here's my theory of evolution:
most creatures evolved separately, not "from each other" like darwin says. first the creatures were made of thoughts (fire element), then they evolved into air, then to jelly (water), and then they became meat (earth, four elements). later our bodies will become thoughts again. when the creatures were still very undeveloped (jelly or something like that), they could have sex with other races which gave birth to a couple of new races, but like i said, most of them evolved separately.
first there was really big creatures (bigger than dinosaurs!) on earth because their bodies didn't weigh much, and small parts of them fell to ground and those parts had their own life and they evolved into small animals later. that's EXACTLY why dinosaurs, the animals and plants were so big before and there were giant humans too! there is evidence of giant human skeletons. and they were really smart because they had such egyptian elongated skulls (which we will have later again when we evolve).
the giants built the statues on easter island. and... that's about it.
what do you think? sounds good?
That was probably a typo - should be jello.spidergoat said:having sex in some kind of jelly.
I agree with Yorda, we are thought-air-jellymeat on fire, having sex in some kind of jelly.
Probably grape.
The first step in demonstrating the truth of evolution is to make the claim that all living creatures must have a living parent.
The second important point in the case for evolution is that some living creatures are very different from some others.
The final point in the case for evolution is this: simple animals and plants existed on earth long before more complex ones (invertebrate animals, for example, were around for a very long time before there were any vertebrates).
Well, if we put these three points together, the rational case for evolution is air tight.
Really now?
or some sort of example of it, I cant seem to find any. Thanks.
An exhaustive summary can be found here: *deleted by moderator*
Hmmm, I seem to remember saying something about threads like these attracting creationist nutball wackos and their shite….
This is a perfect example of why threads like this should be deleted from the outset. I find it thoroughly objectionable that this link appears in a forum that purports to be an “intelligent community”.
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again, there needs to be a dedicated evolution subforum that is separate from the Biology&Genetics subforum. That way, all the wilfully ignorant creationist crackpots and their links can be quarantined in a single subforum, thus leaving the Biology&Genetics subform free of this never-ending creationist bullsh*t.
Hmmm, I seem to remember saying something about threads like these attracting creationist nutball wackos and their shite….
This is a perfect example of why threads like this should be deleted from the outset. I find it thoroughly objectionable that this link appears in a forum that purports to be an “intelligent community”.
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again, there needs to be a dedicated evolution subforum that is separate from the Biology&Genetics subforum. That way, all the wilfully ignorant creationist crackpots and their links can be quarantined in a single subforum, thus leaving the Biology&Genetics subform free of this never-ending creationist bullsh*t.
The rant quoted above is further evidence of the non-scientific prejudice against any argument that refutes an evolutionary point of view. Such a rigidly dogmatic premise would be laughable, if it wasn't so sad.
Thomas Kuhn was right:
http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/us/kuhn.htm
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=64638Moderation in Biology and Genetics forum is aimed at creating a scientific atmosphere for the discussion of topics related to the forum. All discussions must be evidence based, with peer reviewed data as the basis for argumentation.