Cambrian Explosion

Enigma'07 said:
Thanks for pointing this out. Can you give me a referance with the principles of modern Darwinism? Question: neoDarwinism= modern Darwinism?
The primary change has been the discovery of DNA and the development of the various fields of Genetics. Neo-darwinism involved something of a division in the field between the Darwinian school and the Mendellian school. The division was largely mended. Modern Evolutionary theory centers around genetics and populations rather than individuals. It's a lot to cover, kind of like asking for an update in physics since Maxwell, and there are many fields (population gentics, molecular evolution, evolutionary biology, etc.) but here are some good links:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-Darwinism
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/06/index.html
http://www.palaeos.com/Evolution/evolution.htm

~Raithere
 
The vast majority of the bilge on the Cambrian explosion by Creationists is misguided. Lies include that the Cambrian wasthe FIRST appearance of complex life, that there are no transitionals fossils in the Cambrian, that it was 'sudden' (5 million years is not sudden), and that the animal and plant groups appeared together, fully formed. Also, that it contradicts the tree of life (Pre-Cambrian fossils strongly support the tree of life).

I don't want to be accused of lying, so here are my sources. http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC300.html

The Cambrian explosion was the seemingly sudden appearance of a variety of complex animals about 540 million years ago (Mya), but it was not the origin of complex life. Evidence of multicellular life from about 590 and 560 Mya appears in the Doushantuo Formation in China [Chen et al. 2000; 2004], and diverse fossil forms occurred before 555 Mya [Martin et al. 2000]. (The Cambrian began 543 Mya., and the Cambrian explosion is considered by many to start with the first trilobites, about 530 Mya.) There is evidence in the form of wormlike burrows in the Chorhat Sandstone in India of animals over a billion years ago [Seilacher et al. 1998] and trace-like fossils more than 1200 Mya in the Stirling Range Formation of Australia [Rasmussen et al. 2002]. Eukaryotes (which have relatively complex cells) may have arisen 2700 Mya, according to fossil chemical evidence [Brocks et al. 1999]. Fossil microorganisms have been found from 3465 Mya [Schopf 1993]. There is isotopic evidence of sulfur-reducing bacteria from 3470 Mya [Shen et al. 2001] and possible evidence of microbial etching of volcanic glass from 3480 Mya [Furnes et al. 2004].


There are transitional fossils within the Cambrian explosion fossils. For example, there are lobopods (basically worms with legs) which are intermediate between arthropods and worms. [Conway Morris 1998]

Only some phyla appear in the Cambrian explosion. In particular, all plants post-date the Cambrian, and flowering plants, by far the dominant form of land life today, only appeared about 140 Mya [Brown 1999].

Even among animals, not all types appear in the Cambrian. Cnidarians, sponges, and probably other phyla appeared before the Cambrian. Molecular evidence shows that at least six animal phyla are Precambrian [Wang et al. 1999]. Bryozoans appear first in the Ordovician. Many other soft-bodied phyla don't appear in the fossil record until much later. Although many new animal forms appeared during the Cambrian, not all did. According to one reference [Collins 1994], 11 of 32 metazoan phyla appear during the Cambrian, one appears Precambrian, 8 after the Cambrian, and 12 have no fossil record.

And that just considers phyla. Almost none of the animal groups that people think of as groups, such as mammals, reptiles, birds, insects, and spiders, appeared in the Cambrian. The fish that appeared in the Cambrian was unlike any fish alive today.

The length of the "Cambrian explosion" is ambiguous and uncertain, but 5-10 million years is a reasonable estimate; some say the "explosion" spans 40 million years or more, starting about 553 million years ago. Even the shortest estimate of 5 million years is hardly sudden.

There are some plausible explanations for why diversification may have been relatively sudden.

The evolution of active predators in the late Precambrian likely spurred the coevolution of hard parts on other animals. These hard parts fossilize much more easily than the previous soft-bodied animals, leading to many more fossils but not necessarily more animals.

Early complex animals may have been nearly microscopic. Apparent fossil animals smaller than 0.2 mm have been found in the Doushantuo Formation, China, 40 to 55 million years before the Cambrian [Chen et al. 2004]. Much early evolution could have simply been too small to see.

The earth was just coming out of a global ice age at the beginning of the Cambrian [Hoffman 1998; Kerr 2000]. A "snowball earth" before the Cambrian explosion may have hindered development of complexity or kept populations down to where fossils would have been too rare to expect to find today. The more favorable environment after the snowball earth would have opened new niches for life to have evolved into.

Hox genes, which control much of an animal's basic body plan, were likely first evolving around that time. Development of these genes might have just then allowed the raw materials for body plans to diversify [Carroll 1997].

Atmospheric oxygen may have increased at the start of the Cambrian [Canfield and Teske 1996; Thomas 1997; Logan et al. 1995].

Planktonic grazers began producing fecal pellets that fell to the bottom of the ocean rapidly, profoundly changing the ocean state, especially its oxygenation [Logan et al. 1995].

Unusual amounts of phosphate were deposited in shallow seas at the start of the Cambrian [Cook and Shergold 1986; Lipps and Signor 1992].

Cambrian life was still unlike almost everything alive today. Using number of cell types as a measure of complexity, complexity has been increasing more-or-less constantly since the beginning of the Cambrian [Valentine et al. 1994].

Major radiations of life forms have occurred at other times, too. One of the most extensive diversifications of life occurred in the Ordovician, for example [Miller 1997].
http://wiki.cotch.net/wiki.phtml?ti...dicts_evolutionary_tree_pattern&printable=yes

The Cambrian explosion does not show all groups appearing together fully formed, but some animal groups (and no plant, fungus, or microbe groups) appearing over many millions of years in forms very different, for the most part, from the forms that are seen today.

The Cambrian was the first appearance of hard parts, such as shells and teeth, in animals. The lack of readily fossilizable parts before then ensures that the fossil record would be very incomplete in the Precambrian. The old age of the Precambrian era contributes to a scarcity of fossils.

The Precambrian fossils which have been found are consistent with a branching pattern and inconsistent with a sudden Cambrian origin. For example, bacteria appear well before multicellular organisms, and there fossils giving evidence of transitionals leading to halkierids and arthropods.
Genetic evidence also shows a branching pattern in the Precambrian, indicating, for example, that plants diverged from a common ancestor before fungi diverged from animals.
 
Back
Top