"Bush asks for $725 billion in military spending"

Dude, do I even want to know what that is?
Uhh, it's very straight sports bar. Two guys make a fist and bump them together, as in beer soaked agreement on some sports trivia. You muss not be frum arownd here...:bugeye:
 
Uhh, it's very straight sports bar. Two guys make a fist and bump them together, as in beer soaked agreement on some sports trivia. You muss not be frum arownd here...:bugeye:

Ohhh, like a "pound" or "knuckles".
I thought you meant something like "He was too drunk to come, so I gave his prostate the 'ol fistbump."
 
How easy it is to get you folks off-topic.

So, it's not really about defending what you believe you think, it's about trying to make sure that everyone around you agrees with your thinking.

If one can call it that. :D
 
it's not really about defending what you believe you think

That would explain your posting, but...

, it's about trying to make sure that everyone around you agrees with your thinking.

...you lack the argumentative powers to convince anyone of anything they don't already think.
 
Do you actually argue anymore, or just troll?

He has never argued, period. He just dishes out thinly veiled insults.

Best you ignore him. I barely bother to respond to him anymore.

Roman said:
Reviewing your old posts, it seems your mind suffers from senility. Maybe it's the testosterone shutting down, causing you to bitch like a hag.

He's also caused lots of problems for the mods in the past. Mostly for the very reason that he trolls.

Being part of the Illuminati group is great. :D
 
That would explain your posting, but...
...you lack the argumentative powers to convince anyone of anything they don't already think.
I'm not out to see that people think as I do.

I'm out to see that people see how idiotic their own thinking is to folks outside the echo chamber.

I can't change you if you don't want to change.

I can only point you to the exit.
 
Review his posting history. For instance, here.

Well I guess he at least knows enough to be an atheist, and to know that ID is shit.

Should I be happy?

Also, you think I should personally ask that he focus his efforts on arguing with religious people, as at least then he'd be right-as-in-correct?
 
He has never argued, period. He just dishes out thinly veiled insults.
I always argue. And dish out insults. Only the shallow can't see deeper than the thin veiling. ;)
Best you ignore him.
Ignorance is your prefered defense mechanism? What about nose-to-nose confrontation? Afraid of failure?
I barely bother to respond to him anymore.
Risk averse. Hands over ears, hum really loud.
He's also caused lots of problems for the mods in the past.
I've never been banned. I've had a time-out, or two.

I push lots of folks' buttons. Survival is about confronting and overcoming challenges.

Few here agree with me on anything.

If inbreeding is your prefered form of existence, by all means, vote me off the island.

If all you're looking for is a circle jerk, by all means, vote me off the water bed.

You see a troll. I see a carbon rod in a reactor.
 
bla bla bla

You know what'd be really great? If you could set down just why you're so in favor of neoconservatism.
Everyone 'round here would really appreciate it, because as far as we can tell, your argument in support of it goes more or less (from what can be gleaned from the hundreds of 1-liners), "We can. That means we should. Also, we're strong and they're weak, so it's a good idea."
 
You know what'd be really great? If you could set down just why you're so in favor of neoconservatism.
Everyone 'round here would really appreciate it, because as far as we can tell, your argument in support of it goes more or less (from what can be gleaned from the hundreds of 1-liners), "We can. That means we should. Also, we're strong and they're weak, so it's a good idea."
Um, I'm a registered Independent. I vote across party lines.

Give me your operational definition of "neoconservatism" and I'll get back to you.
 
You know what'd be really great? If you could set down just why you're so in favor of neoconservatism.

That would be great. But I'm not holding my breath for anything more than "Because I'm not a stupid liberal".


Roman said:
Everyone 'round here would really appreciate it, because as far as we can tell, your argument in support of it goes more or less (from what can be gleaned from the hundreds of 1-liners), "We can. That means we should. Also, we're strong and they're weak, so it's a good idea."

Really makes you think about the questionable morals of neocons.
 
That would be great. But I'm not holding my breath for anything more than "Because I'm not a stupid liberal".
Yet you play me as your stupid conservative.
Really makes you think about the questionable morals of neocons.
And what has all your real questioning brought you to understand about neocon morals that you can share your list with the rest of us?
 
Um, I'm a registered Independent.

You capitalize "Independent". Is there an Independent Party now?

Whoa.

That was in a day when I believed the demographic was worth more personal investment.

The "free" market taught me otherwise. ;)

Maybe you should continue to spend your time on them. We have a success story, sorta, and his name is §outh§tar (I'll get the relevant thread later). Some theists' shells are breakable.
 
Back
Top