Does this apply in all things? Do people prefer proportionality as a norm?
If you ever wondered about the fairness of life, now you got the answer!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/05/07/scisymmetry107.xml
Beautiful people are not just prettier but they live longer and helthier than YOU. The article doesn't mention it, but they are also more successfull than you.
Just so you know, life isn't far.
"But why? One idea is that the trait is an advert of genetic quality or fertility.
An alternative view is that preferences for a symmetrical face arose from cultural factors and say nothing about health, fecundity and other biological factors.
Now support for the idea that a symmetrical face is indeed a strong advert of mate ‘quality’ is published today in the journal PLoS One by Dr Anthony Little of the University of Stirling and colleagues."
That makes more sense.Shouldn't it be that healthier people look more beautiful and live longer?
I guess so.
Scientists have also found that the body's proportions play an important role in perceptions of beauty as well. In general, men have a preference for women with low waist-to-hip ratios (WHRs), that is, more adipose is deposited on the hips and buttocks than on the waist. Research shows that women with high WHRs (whose bodies are more tube-shaped) are more likely to suffer from health maladies, including infertility and diabetes. However, as is often the case, there are exceptions to the rule.
Psychologists at Newcastle University in England have shown that an indigenous people located in southeast Peru, who have had little contact with the Western world, actually have a preference for high WHRs. These psychologists assert that a general preference for low WHRs is a byproduct of Western culture.
Or people with better genes are healthier and look more beautiful and live longer?
I'd go for that one.
I'm not so sure. Advertising and bombardment with stereotypes does have an effect.
e.g.
Whats a "better" gene?
One that allows you to thrive in your environment as opposed to one that doesn't. It's genes btw as in genome..
Living longer improves your reproductive potential? Whats the difference in reproductive rate for beautiful people you think?
Or people with better genes are healthier and look more beautiful and live longer?
On the other hand, it wouldn't be surprising if there were 'looking good' genes that act to bypass general fitness. This would cause a fluctuation in how relevant looks are to fitness.