BdS misunderstands Fermat's Last Theorem

[Daecon]

I am trying to prove 0 is both a positive and negative integer with those calculations.
If 0 is both a positive and negative integer then the answers are:
This is BdS's answers.
1 - 1 = 0
10 - 12 = 0

-1 - -1 = 0
-10 - -12 = 0

Those sums are obviously wrong.

10 - 12 = -2

-10 - -12 = 2

 

[origin]

This is for the positive integers.
1 - 1 = 0
I agree with this, but is zero a positive integer?

No, 0 is neither positive nor negative.

10 - 12 = -2
In the full integer range that is the correct answer, but -2 is not a positive integer.

Correct

This is for the negative integers.
-1 - -1 = 0
I agree with this, but is zero a negative integer?

See my first reply.

-10 - -12 = 2
In the full integer range that is the correct answer, but 2 is not a negative integer.

Correct. 2 is the answer.

I am trying to prove 0 is both a positive and negative integer with those calculations.

Then you are saying your time.

If 0 is both a positive and negative integer then the answers are:
This is BdS's answers.

1 - 1 = 0. Right
10 - 12 = 0. Wrong

-1 - -1 = 0 right
-10 - -12 = 0 wrong

If 0 is not a positive or negative integer then the answers are:
This is rpenner's answers, I think?
1 - 1 = 1
10 - 12 = 1

-1 - -1 = -1
-10 - -12 = -1

I can assure you that is not the answers rpenner got, he can do arithmetic.

Which are the correct answers? I dont know.

The correct answers are the ones I gave earlier.

Read the link I provided if you are having problems

 

[Daecon]

Zero is both a non-negative and non-positive integer, but it isn't negative or positive.

The list of non-negative integers include zero (0 +1 +2 +3 ...), just like the list of non-positive integers include zero (0 -1 -2 -3 ...).

But neither the list of positive nor the list of negative integers include zero. Only the list of non-positive and non-negative integers include zero.

 

[BdS]

The list of non-negative integers include zero (0 +1 +2 +3 ...)

I know, then how can you say the answer to
10 - 12 = -2
is -2 when we are working in positive integers. -2 is not a positive integer...

just like the list of non-positive integers include zero (0 -1 -2 -3 ...).

I know, then how can you say the answer to
-10 - -12 = 2
is 2 when we are working in negative integers. 2 is not a negative integer...

No, 0 is neither positive nor negative.

I know, Im going to try make it positive and negative and see if it works.

 

[BdS]

If we are working in positive integers then you are limited to 1,2,3,4,5,etc... for the answer. Im trying to make it 0,1,2,3,4,5,etc... for the answer.

Which one makes more sense?
1 - 1 = 0

or

1 - 1 = 1

 

[origin]

Which one makes more sense?
1 - 1 = 0

or

1 - 1 = 1

If I have 1 and I take 1 away, then I do not have any. That means 0.
If I have 1 apple and I take away that 1 apple then, I do not have any apples. That means 0 apples.

I am sorry this is confusing you so.

You are going to have a hell of a time when you progress to guzintos!