Maybe he believes in separation of religion and state?
Yeah...the Supreme Ayatollah of the Islamic Republic of Iran...
:roflmao:
Maybe he believes in separation of religion and state?
Which is what exactly? He didn't jump over fire? Seems like the kind of festival where you might want to avoid political riots.]
Only if Buffalo Roam is an atheist who wants no nativity scenes in the public sphere.
I'm still wondering why this [EVENT] is relevant
What has it affected? Or whom?
Apologies for the hyperbole, SAM.
I guess it effects all of the Iranians who find themselves torn between 3000 years of heritage and their Supreme Leader. I searched the internet for about 30 minutes looking for other Iranian Islamic clerics who have spoken out against this festival in history, but I could find none---this isn't to say that none exist, of course, but if this festival was such a profanity to Islam, one would think that there would have been some previous opposition, especially when that government has had no real problems with the festival for the past 30 years, or the previous 1500.
The Iranians I know are largely liberal, and think that Ahmadinejad is a nut case---this may be due to the fact that I've only met Iranians who have come to America to study, but their point of view is that Tehran is a pretty liberal place, and I find this hard to disbelieve. So, at least from my experience, it seems pretty silly that a government that is supposedly representative of the people would ban a cultural celebration that most Iranians take part in on religious grounds.
guess not; is the ayatollah an israelis?Chahar Shanbeh Soori is a 3000 year old festival that unites all Iranians together. Regardless if you are Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Zoroastrian, Buddhist, Sunni, Shia, Arab, Persian, Kurdish, Caucasian, African, whatever - ALL Iranians celebrate this festival.
Sounds to me like people could get hurt if fire jumping is the pinnacle activity. Not even a rational parent would allow that.Well, all but one, that jack off Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Sunday urged Iranians to dismiss their ancient traditions (which involves fire jumping and preparing a special feast).
the pilgrimage to mecca is an old religious and cultural event, started well before mohammads works and still observedIt'd be like Obama asking Americans not to celebrate the 4th of July. Here's what Khamenei had to say: These [Ancient Zoroastrian Celebrations] have no basis in Islam, and can [therefor] cause "harm and corruption," so for Iranians "It is appropriate to avoid [celebrating] it".
sure, all the way back to when palestine was persian.This festival hearkens back to the days of the ancient Persian Civilization. It's a multicultural celebration - a Festival for ALL Iranians.
sure, just like the dali interprets no eating meat as 'good' but he must (and most all human herbivores) eat meat for proper health.What an INTOLERANT JACK OFF this Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is. Can you imagine the Dali Lama doing something like this? No way.
Then guess what he did. That turd has now LEGALLY Banned The Reform Party. Iran's largest pro-reform political party.
There's little doubt this generation will eventually dump the whole idea of an "Islamic" republic..
Somehow if 70 million people decide not to jump over a fire for one day in a year I don't see it as a life changing moment.
Come to think of it, even if 70 million do jump over a fire I don't see it as a life changing moment.
So exactly how many people boycotted the festival?
Has anyone prevented anyone from jumping over any fire?
evil western media (CNN said:Iran's supreme leader is attempting to extinguish an annual event celebrating the last days of winter and the Persian calendar year, and the government is strengthening its security presence in the days leading up to a major holiday, Iranian media reported.
Yeah because Americans are soooooooooo concerned about Iranians who want to celebrate a Zoroastrian festival. Maybe they'll bomb the country to show how much they disapprove of such intolerance.
Pah.
No, I'm highlighting the hypocrisy.
Was the security presence for the festival or for the political rally, which could have led to violence?
All this pseudo concern for Iranian culture gives me indigestion.
Meh...take some Tums. The question isn't whether we care about Iranian culture, the question is whether you care. I don't have a problem admitting that I don't particularly know about or care about the Iranian culture---if Iranians don't care to jump over fires anymore, that's their business. But, from the woman who argues so vehemently against outside influence in cultural traditions, don't you think that it's a bit odd that you find yourself on the other side of this discussion?
Anyway, do you think that this is something that should be dictated to Iranians? At least I find it odd that a government which is supposedly popularly elected would suddenly outlaw a festival that they previously had no problems with, in conjunction with banning the opposition parties.
Personally, I think they should make street fires illegal.
Are Iranian Americans permitted to light fires in the street and jump over them? Do Iranian expats even celebrate Chahar Shanbeh?
Is it Halloween?
As far as I know---the Iranian guy I knew at Stanford invited me last year to a local celebration, but I couldn't go.
And anyway you are changing the subject again. The opposition from the grand Ayatollah (PBUH) has nothing to do with street fires.
No and it has nothing to do with religion either. Moreover, its an opinion.
evil western media said:Iran's supreme leader is attempting to extinguish an annual event celebrating the last days of winter and the Persian calendar year, and the government is strengthening its security presence in the days leading up to a major holiday, Iranian media reported.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Sunday urged Iranians to dismiss the ancient practice of fire jumping and feasting on Chaharshanbe Soori, a festival held on the eve of the last Wednesday before spring -- this year, March 16. The activities date back thousands of years.
The festivities have no basis in Islam, and can cause "harm and corruption," Khamenei said in a statement published by Iranian news sites. "It is appropriate to avoid it," he said.
So what is the discussion about?
This isn't what the article seemed to imply:
Or is ``corruption'' just a poor translation?
It seems to be about the Iranian government's oppression of it's own people; the outlawing of freedom of speech; the raping and torturing of political protesters in jail; the will of an unelected government.
Or it could be just about some small fires in the street that have been going on for 3000 years that no one will miss.
You tell me sweetheart