Why do they think they are more intelligent when there hasn't been a peep of contribution from them throughout the history of humanity until barely a century or two ago?
And even if their brand of literal thinking is beneficial to them in modern society, how is that anything but an accolade to the success of societies established, developed and sustained by religions?
They sometimes understand atheism, which is more than I can say for any overt Muslim ever to appear on this forum.SAM said:Are atheists lacking in understanding human diversity of thought?
The theists around here tend to breed arrogance in the local atheists, by saying many silly and simplistically foolish things.SAM said:Why do they think they are more intelligent when there hasn't been a peep of contribution from them throughout the history of humanity
Or claiming superior comprehension of human diversity of thought, immediately after linking a bigoted Mormon website as information about the Navajo religion.
The construction is simple. The observation was of a failure to appreciate some diversity of Mormon and Navajo thought.SAM said:Perhaps you might want to deconstruct that sentence.
The construction is simple. The observation was of a failure to appreciate some diversity of Mormon and Navajo thought.
Theists seem to have a very hard time conceiving of ways of thought different from their own, is all, compared with the general run of atheists on these kinds of forums. They tend to make really blatant, silly errors. But then, atheists in theistic societies have had a lot more serious practice in the matter.
The concept I leave aside for the moment - the observation was that thests seem pretty blind to certain varieties of human thought. They often don't recognize diverse ways of thinking, and they tend to lump quite different ways of thinking into undifferentiated bags - the one they label "atheist" is particularly striking.SAM said:I think you're missing the whole concept of diversity of thought.
Living with them is one thing. Having a clue about them is another. The subject was an "understanding" of human diversity of thought.SAM said:I can live with those beliefs even if I think they are erroneous.
Living with them is one thing. Having a clue about them is another. The subject was an "understanding" of human diversity of thought.
The next time you want to illustrate the superior understanding of the diversity of human thought among theists, don't link me to a Mormon fundie website for an explanation of what the Navajo religion is really like, and then start a thread about the lack of common sense regarding human diversity displayed by atheists.SAM said:You're right. Do tell. My increasingly insular society and experiences are incredibly inhibiting
The concept I leave aside for the moment - the observation was that thests seem pretty blind to certain varieties of human thought. They often don't recognize diverse ways of thinking, and they tend to lump quite different ways of thinking into undifferentiated bags - the one they label "atheist" is particularly striking.
Are atheists lacking in understanding human diversity of thought?
Why are so many atheist discussions about destroying human diversity?
Why are they unable to face the poverty of their kind of thinking?
Do atheists want to destroy humanity?
they're following the lead of Dawkins who think anyone who doesn't believe in Evolution is insane
Why do they think they are more intelligent when there hasn't been a peep of contribution from them throughout the history of humanity until barely a century or two ago?
And even if their brand of literal thinking is beneficial to them in modern society, how is that anything but an accolade to the success of societies established, developed and sustained by religions?