Here's my best stab at part two for now, but not in any decent order, more just a string of points to discuss perhaps. Hope it gives some food for discussion now!
The earth's magnetic field is diminishing rapidly, and the poles are drifting and have in recent years temporarily moved up to 10% away from the usual position. This reduction in the field is tied in with the magnetic pole shifts evident from earth samples as having happened at approximately 25000 year intervals. All over the world airport runways are being relaid to account for the move in magnetic poles.
Uranus and Neptune were shown by voyager to to be spinning approximately 40 to 50 off from their central axis.
The earth's heartbeat, or Schumann resonance was for years and years a fixed figure of 7.8 hertz. Recent measurement show it around 8.6 and climbing.
Recent climatic and geological changes - in the last 100 years the sun's magnetic field has increased 230%. Natural disasters up 400% in last 40 years. Volcanic activity up 500% in last 30 years. The sun's heliosphere has grown by a factor of 10 in last 50 years, from 10 to 100 AU, and .
Professor Hans Jenny has made videos of his 'cymatics' experiments, wherein he vibrated a balloon filled with particles in a floating solution at pure diatonic sound frequencies. What he found were the platonic solids created according to the frequency of sound vibration. They would morph one into the next upon a shift in frequency.
Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of DNA later in his life mathematically proved that the DNA molecule was too complicated to have arisen 'naturally' through evolution. We simply haven't had enough evolutionary time to achieve it.
Later on Vladimir Populin put DNA in a tube, shone a laser through it, and watched as the light spiralled through the DNA helix. He removed the DNA and the light stayed in spiral shape.
The sun is not a nuclear furnace. Thirty years ago it was proved the sun doesn't produce enough neutrinos for it to be the byproduct of a nuclear reaction So, where does the sun's heat, light and energy come from?
NASA has discovered the Parker Spiral, of spiralling energies emitted from the sun. This exact same shape has been seen in crop circles. Crop circles with fantastic geometric precision, incorporating all our favourite sacred numbers. In fact, so many of the crop circles have been giving us advance notice, if you will, of future discoveries in hyper-dimensional physics and especially in relation to the octave model of the densities.
Then we have the channelling of Seth and Ra. Between them they channelled and wrote almost a dozen books of material, Ra describing the Law of One. Both of these channellings proved over time (they came about from the 1960s to now, and still continue) to be irreproachable in their consistency, often continuing on the same sentence interrupted in a session from many months before. Both are well worth investigating.
The Law of One material is available from here
http://www.llresearch.org/
A free study guide (and a wonderful read) is posted at
http://ascension2000.com/Ra-studyguide.htm
It talks about 'harvest', when the planetary body completes its third major cycle and shifts into the next density, which for us would be the fourth.
Einstein discovered that time and space are 'opposites'. Not like black and white but like sides of a coin, or as Frank sang, love and marriage - you can't have one without the other. Distance in time is equal to distance in space (look at the Andromeda galaxy and you see it as it was 12 million (million million?) years or so ago, look at the wall and you see it as it was a very, very, very...short time ago, the time it took the light to travel).
Time = Space
In the same way E=MC^2 shows us that energy is mass. The speed of light is there only to balance the measurements. To quote John Dobson
"If you're going to measure space in cm then time must not be measured in seconds, but 'jiffies'. A jiffy is the length of time it takes light to go one cm.' The universe being a trifle on the large side causes us to measure the time in years and the distance in light years. The speed of light in this system is 1. Squared it's still one.
Energy = Mass.
Dobson goes on to say that the energy that constitutes everything, if you could release it in its entirety, corresponds to 500 atom bombs per pound, and of the observable energies we know it can be trimmed down to be gravitational and/or electrical.
He then goes on to show that electrical and magnetic energy are opposites. Wind up a watch and it gets heavier and harder to shake. Why? Because you out potential energy into it and that's the only thing that's hard to shake or move.
You wind up against the gravitational field by moving further away from the object. You wind up against electricity by pushing objects together.
So, you get to a diagram of a square, if you will, cut into four smaller squares, with lines separating each box, as was traditionally thought.
Mass | Space
-----------------------
Energy | Time
Einstein removed the lines, but nobody has been able to tell us what remains behind the question mark. Dobson says
"When we look at this question mark, what we see is that it has to be beyond space and time. Our physics
is on our side of space and time, if you like, but Einstein's equations say that behind our physics there
is this question, "What is it?". We know that it has to be beyond space and time. And for that reason we
can get a negative statement about what it is. If it's beyond time, it must be changeless, because only in
time could we have change. If it's beyond space, it must be both undivided and infinite, because only
within space could we have things finite and divided. Without space you couldn't break a. cookie in two.
Without space you couldn't have cookie crumbs. And without time you couldn't do anything, because
you couldn't have any kind of change. So whatever exists behind this universe must be changeless,
infinite and undivided:"
So, we and all around us are infinite and undivided, yet appear finite and divided.The classic duality.
The Law of One, to my understanding, talks about the oneness experiencing itself subjectively through countless seemingly individual planetary and consciousness bodies, if you will. Everything is an aspect of The One experiencing itself in the process of returning to the one through the octave of densities. The platonic solids morphing from the sphere back to the sphere.
Dobson concludes
"Space is not really that which separates the many. It's that which seems to separate the one. There's
only one. And in that space that oneness shines. Therefore falls whatever falls. Space is not that in
which we see the finite. There is no finite. Space is that in which the infinite appears as small, and in that
space that vastness shines. Therefore bursts whatever bursts. Therefore every electrical particles wants
to become infinite. And therefore shines whatever shines. And time is not that in which we see change,
but that in which the changeless seems to change, and in that time that changeless shines. Therefore
rests whatever rests; therefore coasts whatever coasts.
Our problem is to discriminate between what's behind this notion of space and time and what's within it.
Our problem is to discriminate between the real and the make believe.
So, what is all this energy made of anyway? The greeks said 'aether' (direct translation:shine)
OK, that's enough for now, this post is already way too long. I know I haven't covered everything but please bear in mind I'm trying to summarize half a dozen books of brain-bending stuff into an easy to understand post. hope this gives us something to discuss now!
Peace