Army dismisses gay Arabic linguist

Is the army justified in dismissing openly gay troops?

  • Yes

    Votes: 8 27.6%
  • No

    Votes: 19 65.5%
  • Don't have an opinion either way

    Votes: 2 6.9%

  • Total voters
    29
Fraggle Rocker said:
On the Daily Show tonight, it was disclosed that the linguist delivered a blistering speech opposed to the policy and also made some touching points about personal issues. Unfortunately we'll never know what he said because there is no one left in the Army who understands Arabic.

Few enough understand English or Arithmetic, also.
 
Theoryofrelativity said:
Until they can produce evidence of how gay soldiers effects the efficient murder of innocent civilians then I see no reason why he shouldn't be allowed to continue to perform his duties, particuarly as he can better uderstand the victims 'last words'.

I am sure that gay soldiers "effect" the murders of innocent civilians the way that anyone else does. They use guns and they drop bombs to "effect" those murders.
 
MetaKron said:
No such thing as The Comedy Channel. It's called Comedy Central.

I was not naming the channel, but the intent of the news.
 
I haven't watched the Colbert Report (two silent "t"s), but the Daily Report seems, by its construction and by the information that it brings in from credible sources, to be at least as accurate as any other news outlet. It also seems to give good details that are lacking in many other reports, and with a sardonic sense of humor, the reporters state what is obviously true and absurd. Unfortunately the truth is usually absurd when any politician does anything these days.
 
Hapsburg:

Indeed, I have heard of "The Sacred Band of Thebes", and it necessitated an entire divison exclusively composed of bonded homosexual lovers in order to work. Similarly, there were no straight men who would find it disturbing to be viewed as sexual objects by the gay men. In essence: You must have a military - or at a very least, a platoon - composed exclusively of homosexuals in order for it to work, or none at all,a nd ontop of that, still must secure from them an unwillingness to allow sex and personal loyalty to one another to supercede loyalty to the mission.

Best to remove sex from the equation entirely and avoid the problems all together. Similarly, in our culture, homosexuals are almost exclusively so feminine as to be useless in battle.

Metakron:

The Daily Show also has fake interviews every day, a comedy segment, and routinely turns the news into simply a punchline. Hardly the same as legitimate news shows. The only part which is real is the last interview, which even then, often descends into jokes, or isn't about a serious topic. Danny DeVito was talking about his new show last week.
 
Most of the news IS simply a punchline. It's such a joke that you can only really take it seriously because they still use real bullets and cause real deaths.
 
Prince_James said:
Hapsburg:

Indeed, I have heard of "The Sacred Band of Thebes", and it necessitated an entire divison exclusively composed of bonded homosexual lovers in order to work. Similarly, there were no straight men who would find it disturbing to be viewed as sexual objects by the gay men. In essence: You must have a military - or at a very least, a platoon - composed exclusively of homosexuals in order for it to work, or none at all,a nd ontop of that, still must secure from them an unwillingness to allow sex and personal loyalty to one another to supercede loyalty to the mission.

Best to remove sex from the equation entirely and avoid the problems all together. Similarly, in our culture, homosexuals are almost exclusively so feminine as to be useless in battle.

Metakron:

The Daily Show also has fake interviews every day, a comedy segment, and routinely turns the news into simply a punchline. Hardly the same as legitimate news shows. The only part which is real is the last interview, which even then, often descends into jokes, or isn't about a serious topic. Danny DeVito was talking about his new show last week.


Similarly, in our culture, homosexuals are almost exclusively so feminine as to be useless in battle
:bugeye:


is that a joke?
 
Question:
Is there a reason for this discharge policy? Is it right?
I'd like some reasons for why you voted as you did


1) Yes.

2) Who yet knows?

3) I voted yes. Why?

The military is not a political organization or a social testing ground. It has very few reasons to exist beyond: defence of the nation against aggressors and protecting the interests of the nation through intimidation, and when that fails, efficient annihilation of the "enemy". The justification for dismissing anyone or anything that might interfere with that mission must be a military one. If the perception of the military is that gay soldiers interfere with efficient operation, then it's up to some other agency to demonstrate, beyond a doubt, that this isn't the case.

I have no idea if this is indeed the case. But are they justified? Sure, until someone changes their mind.
 
Hyperqube:

It is not, no. You could probably count masculine homosexuals on one hand.
 
Poor Prince James. He really believes all gay guys are girly!! The vast majority of gay men are not effeminate at all. That must absolutely TERRIFY you as it does other borderline bisexual men. Nope. Drag queens and sissy guys are the stereotype the GodSquad and embarrassing rednecks have given us but it ain't true. So next time you're hanging with your favorite male friend, check out his rectum, he just might be a bit more loose than you ever even fantasized about. Also check out all the straight paratroopers gettin gay on eachother at www.activeduty.com. They'll show you the girly image of gaydom is very incorrect. :D Enjoy!
 
Genji:

I am "borderline bisexual" now? Your rationale for this?

Moreover, it does not terrify me whatsoever, as I'd actually prefer gay men to be masculine, as I find such an utter betrayal of masculinity by the bulk of the gay-community to be far more offensive than anything they might do sexually with one another. Similarly, you cannot be "straight" and then "getting gay with eachother".
 
Prince_James said:
Genji:

I am "borderline bisexual" now? Your rationale for this?

Moreover, it does not terrify me whatsoever, as I'd actually prefer gay men to be masculine, as I find such an utter betrayal of masculinity by the bulk of the gay-community to be far more offensive than anything they might do sexually with one another. Similarly, you cannot be "straight" and then "getting gay with eachother".
Yeah. Straight guys get paid, in the US military, to perform gay sex acts for money. Like $7k an hour. The military's big gay scandal was all over the news just a few months ago. 82nd Airborne and dozens more from San Diego to West Point. Alot of guys got caught. They were straight. You saying that I couldn't have sex with a woman? Money can turn straight guys AND girls gay for awhile. Surely you aren't so naive my Prince.
 
Genji:

"Yeah. Straight guys get paid, in the US military, to perform gay sex acts for money. Like $7k an hour. The military's big gay scandal was all over the news just a few months ago. 82nd Airborne had a dozen guys caught."

Sources for this information, please? I have not heard one word of it.

"They were straight. You saying that I couldn't have sex with a woman? Money can turn straight guys AND girls gay for awhile. Surely you aren't so naive my Prince. "

You cannot remain straight and, even for money, have sexual relations with those of the same sex. Nor can one be gay and do the same for sexual relations with the opposite sex. Categorically, one must be classified as bisexual if one ever experiences consensual sexual experiences with people of the same and different sex.
 
Prince_James said:
Genji:

"Yeah. Straight guys get paid, in the US military, to perform gay sex acts for money. Like $7k an hour. The military's big gay scandal was all over the news just a few months ago. 82nd Airborne had a dozen guys caught."

Sources for this information, please? I have not heard one word of it.

"They were straight. You saying that I couldn't have sex with a woman? Money can turn straight guys AND girls gay for awhile. Surely you aren't so naive my Prince. "

You cannot remain straight and, even for money, have sexual relations with those of the same sex. Nor can one be gay and do the same for sexual relations with the opposite sex. Categorically, one must be classified as bisexual if one ever experiences consensual sexual experiences with people of the same and different sex.
Somebody help me with the gay sex scandal in the US military! It was ALL OVER the news just 2 or 3 months ago! Cases have popped up before. I can't believe you missed it. I'm supposed to have the links??!! Something tells me you are better at the computer than I am so look for yourself! The court proceedings just ended on many of the cases. You really think doing a sex act with a member of your own sex makes you automatically homosexual?? You must be very young and uninformed about reality. I've been with women, more than once and I'm not bi I assure you! Those chicks on the GirlsGoneWild videos are all lesbians?? *chuckle chuckle!* Or are they drunken college girls getting paid to rub eachothers asses and breasts, kiss and roll on the floor nude? How 'bout actors? All actors/actresses in films where there is a same sex scene is immediately turned homosexual?! Anyway, readers help me find articles about the US's big embarrassing gaysex scandal and the trials. This nutjob doesn't believe me and it was even in international news!!! So those US soldiers that forced prisoners to perform sex acts on them are gay? :p
 
Genji:

"Somebody help me with the gay sex scandal in the US military! It was ALL OVER the news just 2 or 3 months ago! Cases have popped up before. I can't believe you missed it. I'm supposed to have the links??!! Something tells me you are better at the computer than I am so look for yourself! The court proceedings just ended on many of the cases."

I'll do a cursory search later. But generally when we reference things and then someone else asks for the references, one ought to provide.

"You really think doing a sex act with a member of your own sex makes you automatically homosexual?? You must be very young and uninformed about reality. I've been with women, more than once and I'm not bi I assure you!"

How can you consider yourself not bi if you have had sex with women and held enough attraction to them to do so? Your preference may be to men, but at the very least, your own actions tell us all that you are clearly a bisexual.

"Those chicks on the GirlsGoneWild videos are all lesbians?? *chuckle chuckle!* Or are they drunken college girls getting paid to rub eachothers asses and breasts, kiss and roll on the floor nude?"

Any girl who will have sex with another girl is, by definition, lesbian or bisexual. So yes, I do believe that they are such.

"How 'bout actors? All actors/actresses in films where there is a same sex scene is immediately turned homosexual?!"

No. The act is stimulated and done purely as a character. However, if it is unstimulated, they are bisexual.

"This nutjob doesn't believe me and it was even in international news!!!"

Please avoid the ad hominem if you might? You would not want me to refer to you as "this fucking faggot" or something of the like, would you?

"So those US soldiers that forced prisoners to perform sex acts on them are gay?"

I explicitly denied that being raped makes one gay or bisexual.
 
Your weird self designed rule about sexuality isn't something that makes enough sense to debate about. You think because I got myself aroused and dove into a stench trench that I'm bi?? It's just sex! Humans are far more complicated than that. Anyway, check out Free Thoughts while I look for more links since no one is helping me!!!!!!!!!!!!! :mad:
 
Genji:

Thanks for the link. That being said, a dozen guys in the military engaging in gay porn does not make homosexuality the practice of a great deal of masaculine men in the present day and age. I would also like to note that clearly my comments were employing exaggeration to get the point cross that the majority of homosexuals - rather than every single one - adopt feminine personality and character traits. If you would care to debunk this, please provide some sources and I'd be happy to concede if I have been shown to be wrong.

Question: Do you ever watch the gay TV network "Logo"? I do for Xena repeats in the morning. Their programming includes an extremely high amount of homosexual men which are of the sterotypical feminine type, in contrast to only a small fraction of what one would construe as masculine. Considering this TV network specifically caters to the gay audience and considers itself representational of it...
 
Back
Top