"Love is how."
How what?
"Love is how."
How what?
Love creates the seed of the universe. Like Spinoza.
Love is fine ; but I would also add respect and understanding
Love
Love
Love can only be one thing.
Love is a many splendid thing
It's the April rose that only grows in the early spring,
Love is nature's way of giving a reason to be living,
The golden crown that makes a man a king.
Lost on a high and windy hill,
In the morning mist two lovers kissed and the world stood still,
When our fingers touch my silent heart has taught us how to sing,
Yes, true love's a many-splendored thing.
Oops sorry I normally only do that in the shower
If by 'deep' you mean 'inane' then I totally agree.This thread is deep.
...Hmmm...Love is a ma ... ow to sing,
Yes, true love's a many-splendored thing.
Oops sorry I normally only do that in the shower
This thread is deep.
Science is concerned with the actual nuts and bolts of how the universe works. They are always investigative.
Religionists say "God is unchanging." Well, that is what science depends on as in what makes anything tick consistently.
When you see, for instance, sports stars thank the almighty and give credit to their faith, it is about lifeforce. That has validity in its own context. The difference and problem lies in when there is a misunderstanding and crossed wires. The spirit understands the potential of creativity, growth and change even among the non-tangible where science is concerned with foundations which for all practical purposes has more weight. It's when religionists even unknowingly cross the line into touting inspiration or speculation which is their faith as facts. Its real to them but they should understand that is their own experience. Science, on the other hand, can sometimes devalue or dismiss anything yet unproven or unable to be harnessed at a tangible level.
Science is constantly learning.
I couldn't log in - think I was hacked, lesson on me leaving my computer on 24 hours.
Now I'm running windows 10, and everything isn't upside down.