Science is concerned with the actual nuts and bolts of how the universe works. They are always investigative.
Religionists say "God is unchanging." Well, that is what science depends on as in what makes anything tick consistently.
When you see, for instance, sports stars thank the almighty and give credit to their faith, it is about lifeforce. That has validity in its own context. The difference and problem lies in when there is a misunderstanding and crossed wires. The spirit understands the potential of creativity, growth and change even among the non-tangible where science is concerned with foundations which for all practical purposes has more weight. It's when religionists even unknowingly cross the line into touting inspiration or speculation which is their faith as facts. Its real to them but they should understand that is their own experience. Science, on the other hand, can sometimes devalue or dismiss anything yet unproven or unable to be harnessed at a tangible level.
Religionists say "God is unchanging." Well, that is what science depends on as in what makes anything tick consistently.
When you see, for instance, sports stars thank the almighty and give credit to their faith, it is about lifeforce. That has validity in its own context. The difference and problem lies in when there is a misunderstanding and crossed wires. The spirit understands the potential of creativity, growth and change even among the non-tangible where science is concerned with foundations which for all practical purposes has more weight. It's when religionists even unknowingly cross the line into touting inspiration or speculation which is their faith as facts. Its real to them but they should understand that is their own experience. Science, on the other hand, can sometimes devalue or dismiss anything yet unproven or unable to be harnessed at a tangible level.