John J. Bannan
Registered Senior Member
Is Vern right? See http://photontheory.com/TheEvidence.html
No. If Vern were right he would have linked to an article in a peer reviewed journal.
No, because the universe began as a highly energetic dense slew of particles, not a very thinly spread low density haze of low energy particles.O.K. AN says that the universe will eventually end up as "Neutrinos, photons, electrons and possibly the lightest supersymmetric particle, if R symmetry exists." Does this tell us anything about how the universe began?
Physicists are so smitten by Quantumania that they can no longer even think of an alternative. It was Shrodinger who said "I hate Quantum Mechanics; I wish I had never had anything to do with it."BenTheMan said:No. If Vern were right he would have linked to an article in a peer reviewed journal.
BenTheMan said:Finally, if everything WERE made of photons, then everything would decay into photons. This is the second law---things always decay into predominantly the lightest decay products that they're allowed to decay into. Because we have electrons and quarks hanging around, it doesn't seem very likely that electrons and quarks could decay into photons---otherwise they already would have.
Well if m=hv/cc then mass is electromagnetic change. So photons are just another state of mass.BenTheMan said:Photons are massless, so they can't explain mass.
BenTheMan said:Photons only interract with particles which are electrically charged, so they can't explain neutrinos, or the color force, or nuclear decays.
True, but that's not what happens when the universe has spread out, cooled and all particles which can decay have decays.Because they are stable, they don't spontaneously decay. Smack them hard enough and they will show you their photons.
But it isn't.Well if m=hv/cc then mass is electromagnetic change. So photons are just another state of mass.
There's no such working theory.BenTheMan you hit upon the only problem I have ever found with the idea that photons comprise all mass. It is very difficult to get a neutrino out of that. About the only way would be to consider it a spin polarized photon doing some kind of dance. That's the one big problem with the notion. There's no problem with nuclear decays, the color force is part of QED which is an opposing theory; if photons comprise all mass, QED goes out the window. Of course all the observations remain. They are just explained differently.
They are 'smitten' because it works.Physicists are so smitten by Quantumania that they can no longer even think of an alternative. It was Shrodinger who said "I hate Quantum Mechanics; I wish I had never had anything to do with it."
Except that QM is experimentally verified. Are you on drugs or are you just psychotic?I myself suspect that QM was foisted upon us by little green space-men who want to keep us from ever realizing the true nature of the universe.
It proves very well that the rules of statistical probability work. But it is the reason that no great advancements have been made in physics during its dominance.AlphaNumeric said:They are 'smitten' because it works.
I think if you look back over your whole post you will see that it does not make sense. Whenever QM does not agree with reality, there's something wrong with reality. And if anybody tries to even think of anything converse with QM theory they are automatically crackpots.AlphaNumeric said:True, but that's not what happens when the universe has spread out, cooled and all particles which can decay have decays.
All you have to do to make string theory work is to show how a photon is made of a string. From there on you have the facts that all add up to a probability very close to certain.Reiku said:Oh alphanumeric is a string theorist. He would hate the idea that anything other than the hypothetical string is primal.
I always thought of it as a kind of mathematical masterbationReiku said:I tend not to theorize about string theory. I don't really understand it, nor do i like the idea of having several extra dimensions. I find it, overdone as a theory.