I have no credentials in zoology.
Thats for sure.
Like anyone, I often look up the article on a specific animal for various reasons--a human being killed by one of them, for example... or more likely, would it be smart, legal, fun and affordable to keep one on our own two acres? Much as I'd like to have a capybara (they're adorable, gentle, amusing, affectionate and get along fine with other pets), the wife and I aren't going to the trouble and expense of building a swimming pool for him/her.
....
Do you make a lot of friends with that surly attitude???Yet that isn't the attitude you display in your posting. You're angry, haughty, snarky, insulting and dismissive. Not to mention self-contradictory.
Ohhh? Kinda can say the same with you, its both your attitude and comprehension that is quite ill, how can you be so confident even when the same weight figures was provided by me many post ago? Its like talking to a brick wall, I show lions are bigger with credible sources, then you keep blabbing on as if youve proven by showing me to my face you weighed 100s of tigers and hand taped measured your self tigers taller than lions. No one is angry bro, I think your animosity is coming from the lack of argument.
Would you mind showing where I contradicted my self? Or is this more of your genius wit youve displayed so far? Friends? Got plenty on subject, atleast they can comprehend.
You have berated Wikipedia as a source of information several times and in several ways, yet the majority of your argument seems to be from Wikipedia articles in other languages, most of which are not vetted as diligently as the English version.
Awww, so no taking up the challenge? Thought so, anyone can see the logs, we can also see the dates those wiki accounts were added in, they were just put there recently, the accounts I showed was dormant there for 10x as long, so what more are you gona lie about? That site didnt get anything from wiki, more like wiki got it from that site. Yes, and I'll say it again, wikipedia, isnt any sort of reliable sources, especially on something that can be unchecked with no expert or mod that has any degree in that subject.
English version? More like the bias person only knows how to speak english, hence doesnt know how to go by adding and manipulating the other languages. Again all that you say is empty, I dont need to adhere to someone who has made up his mind before even knowing any facts. You'd favor bigger things to smaller things regardless if there was over a thousand accounts of the smaller beating the bigger. Unfortunately for you, there isnt even 5 times on record a polar bear defeating a lion, yet countless of times lions have killed bears:
Lion named Nero kills 3 bears and almost kills a tiger:
Otherwise, there would be more scraps between them than a few. "As it is, there are plenty. There was one lion we had that killed a polar bear and two Thibet bears, bit a tiger in the back and nearly killed it: and once, while in the runway after a performance, he grabbed a lioness and carried her into the arena. "Nero, as we called that lion, made a mistake that time, though, because the hole lioness turned on him in the arena and thrashed him well, hurting him badly in the fight. "There isu't cne of us in the place that hadn't been bitten and clawed a lot, generally, however, unintentionally. This' may Found strange, but it is true, nevertheless. "You see, the big cats don't know how strong t-hey are, and the curved claws are like steel hooks, curving inward as they i,.; and once they sink in. something ha to come with them. A lion can hurt you just as badly by placing his paw easily on your hand or lez and simply sinking his claws in and contracting them, as though he made a swipe at you and rea.-'K-d you.
And the same is true of all the cats! Lions are the easiest to train as a rule, because less nervous than the others. It doesn't at what age you bozin to work them. and. as matter of fact, those direct from the wilds are easier to train than then born in captivity. "Most of them are just as notional as any woman ever thought of being. They take likes and dislikes, and they stick to them f,r good. "'I have a photograph of one of my lions taken with a Philadelphia minister, a Presbyterian. I think he was. who came into the place one day, and after standing in front of the cage for sometime, asked me if he could go into the case. I let him o so. and that lion just made the biggest f-- over him you ever heard of and kicked up an awful Vow when he left the caze. If that m:.n were to come in now and whistle for the lion, the brute would howl like mad uptil the minister went over to his caze and stroked him. "I remember once, in Buffalo, putting- a little black cur dog in a cage with a lion and tiger that worked together.
https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/135352445/
Nero killed a polar bear and 2 bears, Prince killed a polar bear, Leo killed a polar bear named Peary, 2 lionesses mauled a polar bear beyond recognition, 4 lions fought 3 polar bears killing one and wounded the other, in oddessa circus a lion mauled two polar bears, Pete taylors lioness mauled a polar bear, Louis roth noted a lion who killed a polar bear, Alfred courts young lion Artis killed two polar bears and a Big lion named Brutus killed a large polar bear. With a slew of accounts of lions killing all sorts of bears, from sloth, grizzly, romanian brown bears, himalayin bears, atlas brown bears, Scandinavian brown bears, black bears and more. Yet only a hand full of accounts (less than 5) of lions being killed by bears, all which show details of non-adult animals. The account the polar bear killed a lion named dallas, it said the lion was one years old, the bear the lion killed in flordia showed the act with no lions with large manes, ect.
You just seem frustrated that your arguments are empty, while mine is concrete in backing up all the advantages I've named lions have over the grizzly. Only you've contradicted yourself.