spidergoat said:I don't understand why this would make any difference in your experience of God. I think a pantheistic viewpoint could include evolution. God Himself must have evolved from a less complex form.
Lori_7 said:What I'm saying is that teaching Darwinism is just as biased as teaching ID. They are both theories, and if you're going to justify teaching one, then the same justification can be used to teach them all..
That implies stagnation.God doesn't evolve.
Something stagnant can't be perfect.He's already perfect.
Everything is in a state of change, why would God be different?Only bodies evolve.
How would you know that invisible things don't change if you can't see them?Visible things.
Why not?Not the causes.
Of what?The existence.
All life is in a state of change.Life.
Every self is in a state of change.The self.
Katazia said:Something stagnant can't be perfect.
Everything is in a state of change, why would God be different?
How would you know that invisible things don't change if you can't see them?
Why not?
Of what?
All life is in a state of change.
Every self is in a state of change.
Such is the nature of communication.You have a different definition of perfection than me.
Nothing means nothing so nothing more need be said.Because he is nothing.
Something is either invisible or it is not. If you mean nothing then say nothing. Do not expect to be understood when you persist in being deliberately obscure.When I said invisible things, I don't mean invisible to human eyes, I mean completely invisible: nothingness.
A cause is a cause and causes can change. They cannot exist where everything is non existent since they exist which negates the state of non-existence.Because they exist in the presence where everything is invisible and non-existent.
What does it mean to answer a question with the question?Existence.
There is nothing else.Only the visible bodies which life uses.
Self is that which has awareness and all persons qualify. There are many self’s. We know of no other.By self I don't mean person.
1. These sites make their conclusions based on the premise that speciation occurs. That is what is still being debated. Keep in mind that evolution and speciation are related, but two different things. We can speculate from evidence of evolution, that speciation occurs, but thus far, we have no experiments that have reproduced the results, precisely.Michael said:
Katazia said:A cause is a cause and causes can change. They cannot exist where everything is non existent since they exist which negates the state of non-existence.
Lori_7 said:Evolution within a species is observable and is fact. But you can not conduct an experiment that would prove or support Darwin's theory, or essentially, that man evolved from some primordial slime.
Lori_7 said:And as far as ID goes...You observe a building, you assume an architect. You observe a bridge, you assume an engineer. You observe art, you assume an artist. It's very reasonable, based upon what we know from observation and from science.
Don’t be silly, of course they have. I cause you to look foolish and many people have seen me.No one has ever seen a cause.
OK.Every effect must have a cause.
So either your previous statement is false or “nothingness isn’t an effect”. But that can’t be true either. Nothingness is an effect since it is the result of the absence of something. For example if something is removed then nothingness is the effect. Hence nothingness is caused.The only thing that doesn't need a cause is nothingness.
But every cause is something which suggests an infinite cycle of cause and effect. You are perhaps confusing the concept of something new being created but there is no indication that anything new has ever been created from nothing. What we see in physics is a continual ever-changing morphing of that which already exists, with no creations or destructions."Something" can't cause anything, since every "something" needs a cause in order to be.
If you are a god then so am I. But in this competition of who can be the most idiotic then I have no problem losing to you.Katazia, what are you trying to do? Do you think you can defeat me? I am GOD, you can't be more powerful than I am. Are you trying to say that YOU are also GOD?
Katazia said:Don’t be silly, of course they have. I cause you to look foolish and many people have seen me.
But every cause is something which suggests an infinite cycle of cause and effect. You are perhaps confusing the concept of something new being created but there is no indication that anything new has ever been created from nothing.