A ? of force.

[theorist-constant12345]

You all really have the lack of understanding and do not get me at all. I am not ignorant of science, or too science, it is science that brought me to my ideas that do not conflict with present information.
You just really can not understand, that in learning science, it really did something to my mind, and without trying not to sound insane, I can literally see the Matrix of reality and all the science within the Matrix .
You can not even understand that all matter is mirrored by light, or that when the ice melts up North that will have an effect of the density at the poles, meaning less weight, meaning less compression on the inwards point to gravity.
The Earth will change shape on a big scale, the entire crust will become displaced. But does science want to listen ? supposing I was correct and all of you are ignoring this?

Think about what I am saying , that is all I ask.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

I think the equator will contract.

 

[Russ_Watters]

....it really did something to my mind, and without trying not to sound insane, I can literally see the Matrix of reality and all the science within the Matrix .

Then you should see an eye doctor and a psychiatrist.

 

[Dywyddyr]

I am not ignorant of science, or too science

Yes you are.

my ideas that do not conflict with present information.

That is a lie. As many of your posts show.

You just really can not understand, that in learning science, it really did something to my mind, and without trying not to sound insane, I can literally see the Matrix of reality and all the science within the Matrix .

More evidence of your delusion.

You can not even understand that all matter is mirrored by light

No it's not.

or that when the ice melts up North that will have an effect of the density at the poles, meaning less weight, meaning less compression on the inwards point to gravity.

What?

The Earth will change shape on a big scale, the entire crust will become displaced.

Nope.

supposing I was correct and all of you are ignoring this?

You haven't been correct on anything so far.
Which makes this claim also unlikely.

Think about what I am saying , that is all I ask.

We give it about as much (rational) thought as you've put into it: zero.

I think the equator will contract.

And the main reason you think this is because you're wilfully and persistently ignorant.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Then you should see an eye doctor and a psychiatrist.

The point I know it sounds insane makes me knowing it is not insane because the Matrix to reality I see is all science based.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Yes you are.


That is a lie. As many of your posts show.


More evidence of your delusion.


No it's not.


What?


Nope.


You haven't been correct on anything so far.
Which makes this claim also unlikely.


We give it about as much (rational) thought as you've put into it: zero.


And the main reason you think this is because you're wilfully and persistently ignorant.

Told you in another thread, please test my so called ignorance.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Yes you are.


That is a lie. As many of your posts show.


More evidence of your delusion.


No it's not.


What?


Nope.


You haven't been correct on anything so far.
Which makes this claim also unlikely.


We give it about as much (rational) thought as you've put into it: zero.


And the main reason you think this is because you're wilfully and persistently ignorant.

Dude I am not ignorant it is forces at work. Think about if you reduce the force at the north poles by reducing weight, what happens with the forces, the equator will contract , to replace the loss to regain shape.

 

[Dywyddyr]

Told you in another thread, please test my so called ignorance.

Oh, you mean the thread where I listed some of your erroneous claims?
That thread?

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Oh, you mean the thread where I listed some of your erroneous claims?
That thread?

I am not a scientist , noted, I do have good ideas and good vision, you can probably do the maths, to the density mass function. The crust , the mantle, will shift to keep gravity isotropic by density.

Work it out dude.
Example to what I am saying . look. consider the forces. We will have gravity shift.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

The two ton of pressure holds the 10 ton of pressure in place.

 

[Dywyddyr]

I am not a scientist

That's painfully evident.

I do have good ideas and good vision

No you don't.

you can probably do the maths, to the density mass function. The crust , the mantle, will shift to keep gravity isotropic by density.

Word salad.

Example to what I am saying . look. consider the forces. We will have gravity shift.

Drivel.

The two ton of pressure holds the 10 ton of pressure in place.

Word salad again.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

That's painfully evident.


No you don't.


Word salad.


Drivel.


Word salad again.

Yes I agree word salad, but I know you really understand it. I do not know how to word it exact. unless you want me to say when the poles finally melt, it is the end for all of us because the Earth will try to implode to compensate for mass density displacement over gravity function.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

At least we become more of a sphere...

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Blow a huge balloon up with a heavy weight on top of it in a central position, then remove the weight and watch the slackness of the balloon to pressure shift.

 

[Dywyddyr]

Yes I agree word salad, but I know you really understand it.

I understand that you're spouting bollocks.

when the poles finally melt, it is the end for all of us because the Earth will try to implode to compensate for mass density displacement over gravity function.

This too is bollocks.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

I understand that you're spouting bollocks.


This too is bollocks.

No it is not , think about it, try the balloon observation experiment, there will be huge pressure shift, the Physics says so.

 

[Dywyddyr]

the Physics says so.

Given your massive ignorance of physics you have no valid grounds for saying this.
The Earth is not a balloon.
It's not comparable to a balloon.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Even better try the balloon observation using elastic bands has an equator.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Given your massive ignorance of physics you have no valid grounds for saying this.
The Earth is not a balloon.
It's not comparable to a balloon.

I know the Earth is not a Balloon, but the earths shape relies on the pressure of the centripetal force, the gravity holding its present shape, change the density at any one point, and the density changes else where. Blow a balloon up expanding the bands at the same time has blowing so they fit just right and also the weight in a central top position, also whilst blowing up, then remove the weight , the bands become slack, this does represent the situation of the poles if you consider how much weight the ice imposing inwards to gravity.

 

[AlexG]

He gets crazier and stupider with every post.