A new test of logic.

Status
Not open for further replies.
"In the tree are not apples," looks like a sentence with a grammatical error. It looks like you were trying to say, "In the tree are no apples," and didn't get it right. No one expects that to be part of the puzzle; we're all too busy smirking about the poor writing.
 


Solution:
In the tree are two apples, so "in the tree are apples"-true.
I shake the tree, one apple falls,so "I shake the tree, apples do not fall."-true.
In the tree is a single apple,so "In the tree are not apples."-true

:p


Glitch:

"In the tree are not apples." - grammatically incorrect statement.

There can be no intel where there is no grammar. :D
 


Solution:
In the tree are two apples, so "in the tree are apples"-true.
I shake the tree, one apple falls,so "I shake the tree, apples do not fall."-true.
In the tree is a single apple,so "In the tree are not apples."-true

:p


This is the solution? omg just for that I hate riddles!
 
Why the hell are you guys spamming the Intelligence and machines subforum with riddles? This and the other thread have nothing to do with intelligence and machines.

I agree with this. These kind of things do have a rightful place but it isn't here. It's called the Math & Physics subforum or the Linguistics subforum.
 
btw how is this a test of logic? I don't see how it's logical at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top