invert_nexus said:
This might be a bit off topic, but this is what I've always wondered about Aids. Why doesn't it spread through mosquito bites? It's a blood disease right? Malaria is a blood disease as well, right? Why don't you get it the same as malaria? Is it possible that something in the mosquito kills the virus? I'm sure I'm not the first person to come up with this idea. Or maybe mosquitos do spread it, but there is no media coverage of it to prevent a panic. I don't know, just a thought.
I suppose if AIDS were a virus caused disease eventually some mosquito would infect someone. Here there are pradoxes. The HIV test is not a test for HIV, rather what is considered the antibody to HIV, or assumed so. The rational goes that if antibodies are present so must the virus be present. The catch 22 is that the presence of antibodies is evidence the body is properly defending itself.
Look at the statistics. AIDS is not an epidemic that ravages people with egalitarian zeal. AIDS is confined to a well defined set of social groups, GAy males between 20 and 45 with a life style of drugs, many sex partners, many trips to he VD clunic, massive doses of antibiotics , a dimal diet, high strress and you name it; and intranvenous drug users. Both these groups comprise approximately 90% of AIDS victims.
No wonder the immune system goes through the floor with the kind of activity described.
If you want an eye opener here is a little test you can conduct yourself. Ask any doctor MD,, what causes AIDS? She will more than likely respond that "HIV cause AIDS" . Next question, "What scientific evidence do you use doctor that proves to you that HIV causes AIDS?" You will always get either "BS hem hawing", or an honest answer "I don't know".
Ask yourself what scientific evidence do you use to prove to yourself that HIV causes AIDS? None, is my guess. We all have been educated by the hypnotic humm of our television sets. Have you ever noticed that the communication is one way with the boob tube? When you hear an "expert" discussing AIDS does he give conclusions or science and can you easily check the claimed science? Trust is the watch word. Trust me trust me truist me, and most of us do.
Here is a bet for anyone to grab. I will bet any sum that no responsible "scintifically competent person "employed by the NIH
will everr stand before the public and list 10 or twenty or any number of published scientific documents that he claims proves the HIV = AIDS asumption. Remember, the HIV/AIDS connection has been discussed in the most certian of language, "No doubt at all", "the most researched disease in history". etc. Why then are there all the dismal " we don't know how HIV causes AIDS, but we are sure that HIV causes AIDS"
Listen to what people are saying when they are lying through their teeth .Now that's good advice.