stranger-how so?
This thread is only 1 page long. Look.
Exodus 20:15 Thou shalt not steal.
stranger-how so?
*************Saul & Job never existed.
A Christian could view the Bible as a flawed human document inspired by God.
That the various writers of the Bible did their best, but the results were affected by their cultures and psychologies. Still these Christians believe essential truths and inspiration can be found in the Bible especially in the 4 Gospels.
Q tends to start ranting about God being the authority and that Christians must listen to God.
(perhaps in a past life Q was a Fire and Brimstone preacher, who knows)
These non-fundamentalists do not disagree
but they do not think it is as easy as Q seems to think it is to know what God wants and has 'said'.
Thus they feel there is a process via prayer and contemplation and perhaps discussions with other Christians and listening to experts – whom they choose from amongst the wide variety of churches out there.
Thus they need not decide to hate homosexuals, a pet issue of Strangers, and do not need to be threatened by carbon dating and estimates of the age of the earth or when animals evolved or humans for that matter.
Q and Stranger think that they are in the position of saying that only fundamentalists are real Christians, despite the fact that they are not Christians and are not agreed with by many Christians on this issue.
So why do they do Q and Stranger take this position. One possibility:
It makes it easier for them.
If you have to take the entire Bible literally, then you do run into contradictions with Science
I think it is ironic, in a way that seems to escape Q, that he is, essentially, setting himself up as a religious authority, and seems intent in not admitting that this role serves his position and might not be justified. His sidekick may not realize that in supporting Q, he is also saying that in fact there are millions and millions less Christians in the world and that only fundamentalist Christians can be Christians.
Many people want their enemies simple. They like to demonize or oversimplify issues. You can see this when countries gear up to war. You can see this here in threads where atheists bash theists as if they are all fundamentalists. You can see it here in threads where theists bash atheists for being without morals or for not being creative or whatever.
*************Stranger-Now you're arguing like my wife,"If you don't know, then I'm not telling you!" LOL I'll respond to you, much as I do to her,"If you won't tell me then why should I care?" Do John 3:16 next. I don't want to be accused of preaching by forum rules.
MW-SQUAWK! GOD IS A DUCK! SQUAWK! ALL RELIGIONS ARE FALSE!
Here's one for you. Kindly prove the existence of Julius Caesar to my satisfaction.
Christians who don't agree with the bible are clearly hypocrites.
If a Christian says that the Bible is the word of God and is perfect and meant to be literal in its entirety than that Christian is hypocritical if they pick and choose. If a Christian does not believe the Bible is a perfect, direct from God document, but something that is inspired by God or attempts by different writers to relay God's messages or a document that is distorted by the culture and psychology of the people of that time, etc., then the Christian is not a hypocrite for choosing those portions that feel correct for them.However that's the Old Testament the book of the Jews, the New Testament is the book of for Christians. So Christians really only need follow their own book.
Stranger-Now you're arguing like my wife,"If you don't know, then I'm not telling you!" LOL I'll respond to you, much as I do to her,"If you won't tell me then why should I care?"
Do John 3:16 next. I don't want to be accused of preaching by forum rules.
MW-SQUAWK! GOD IS A DUCK! SQUAWK! ALL RELIGIONS ARE FALSE!
Here's one for you. Kindly prove the existence of Julius Caesar to my satisfaction.
MW-out of fairness, I will seek those titles out, but I can't honestly say I'll be able to objectively read them. I will try. I've tried checking out your previous posts, but am too much of a novice of board navigation.
*************MW-out of fairness, I will seek those titles out, but I can't honestly say I'll be able to objectively read them. I will try. I've tried checking out your previous posts, but am too much of a novice of board navigation.
CutsieMarie89
You have to believe Jesus was the son of God or you aren't a Christian. There can be no variations on this point.
adoptionists tend to believe that Jesus Christ was merely a man, or maybe even a special man, upon whom [god] conferred special favor or status, but that He was never a genuine Son of God.
http://www.triunegod.org/heresies/index.html
i I take it you also believe Egypt and Pharoah never existed.Saul & Job never existed.
If a Christian says that the Bible is the word of God and is perfect and meant to be literal in its entirety than that Christian is hypocritical if they pick and choose. If a Christian does not believe the Bible is a perfect, direct from God document, but something that is inspired by God or attempts by different writers to relay God's messages or a document that is distorted by the culture and psychology of the people of that time, etc., then the Christian is not a hypocrite for choosing those portions that feel correct for them.
It is really very simple.
To be hypocritical is to behave in ways that contradict one's beliefs. If you belief the whole thing is the literal truth, period, well you better damn well follow it word for word.
If not, not.
One can ask such a person how they decide which parts are literal and or true and the issue can run off into epistemological areas, but that is another issue.