9/11 Poll

Who was responsible for 9/11?


  • Total voters
    90
Status
Not open for further replies.
scott3x said:
I believe that me and Trippy have reached an understanding. There was a point which even he acknowledged he dodged, however. This is that while I don't deny that I have in the past insulted him, my insults were far lighter than his.

I beg to differ, I would argu that your insults were equally heavy, the only difference is, I was up front with mine, and yours were thinly veiled.

I see. Can you atleast accept that what you believe to be thinly veiled I believe to be lighter insults?
 
I’m going to skip through some of your posts here. You are just repeating the same lies over and over and it is going nowhere. If you see a comment that you wanted me to respond to then mention it and I wont play dishonest games to avoid a response.

Because of the insults (lighter but still there- here you go again with the untrue 'lies' comment), making sure you respond to my points is not exactly a high priority for me. But if there was something I felt really needed addressing, I'll bring it up.


shaman_ said:
scott3x said:
I contend that I make claims I -can- defend, but you make so many insults that I'm no longer interested in defending them with -you-.

So you are eager to defend your behaviour (demonstrated by your regular responses) but refuse to defend your 9/11 claims? Can you see how stupid that sounds?

Again with the insults (stupid). I am defending my points on civility and even a bit of the 9/11 stuff now from your new posts. As I said, you're going lighter on the insults now, although they're definitely still in there.


shaman_ said:
scott3x said:
Trippy's speciality is chemisty, which isn't exactly my forte

Scott you struggle against the laymen.

If you want to believe that, go ahead.
 
I'm closing this thread to start a new 9/11 thread since this one is too large. In all honesty if it was up to me, I would probably shut down all discussion here, the main reason for that is that it's not going anywhere new, however since some of you are paranoid delusionals that would otherwise think it a government conspiracy to silence you (You nutty crackpots!)...

I've got to allow you the opportunity to continue driveling about your conspiracy theories. What I say however is that there is no point arguing points that have already been argued, so if someone wants to argue something thats already been covered, please just link the post from the original thread to save time and effort on your part.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top