I could give a rat's ass about Jones' credentials.
For me..It's all common sense. I understand the motive for Muslim extremists to attack our country...they saw us as a "Clear and Present danger" to their way of thinking...and they were right...America is a threat to an extreme Muslim way of life. They wanted to hurt us as badly as they could...and one of them came up with the brilliant idea that a commercial aircraft full of fuel for a cross-country flight makes a damn good weapon.
Explosives do a better job, as 9/11 clearly illustrated. Did you know that the official story now has it that Osama Bin laden is not behind it all? The FBI had never charged him with the crime because they simply didn't find enough evidence to do so. Apparently they're now accusing some sheikh who's in prison (no word on whether the FBI thinks that there's enough evidence to charge -him-, but hey, the important thing is that they got some guy in prison, so people -please- stop going on about 9/11 type thing).
They found a chink in our armour and utilized it to their benefit.
On the other hand...I cannot come up with a reasonable motive for the US gov't to want to bring down buildings in New York. There are far easier way to accomplish the same goal. As example in Iraq...want to go to war with someone?...just claim they have WMD...it was good enough to start the war in Iraq.
The Bush administration tried to tie Al Quaeda to Iraq and I think that, during the time of the invasion, a fair amount of people believed it. Then everyone found out that the bush administration had relied on some Arab who simply wanted a green card for their info. I remember one story where the Bush administration seemed to be perfectly happy with the idea of fabricating evidence if they couldn't have found it; fortunately for them, this green card seeking Arab could figure out what they wanted to hear and told it to them (for a little green card help, natch). No links, but I suppose I could look around if you're interested.
The question is "Who benefits?"
Indeed. Let's have a look, shall we?
Certainly not the Taleban, who lost their country (although they seem to be making a comeback nowadays).
Or Al Quaeda, who lost their most friendly host government (the Taleban, but they also seem to be making a comeback as well now).
Both the Taleban and Bin Laden repeatedly stated they weren't behind it. There was a video wherein Bin Laden supposedly stated that he did, but many (myself included) believe that video was of a man who was clearly not Bin Laden. And now the US government claims it was someone else anyway.
Not Saddam Hussein, who didn't even get along with Al Qaeda and who has now been executed.
*********
Now let's take a look at certain individuals a little closer to home:
http://www.oilempire.us/911why.html
http://www.oilempire.us/911peakoil.html