The latter url describes a regular thermate mixture.
Thermate TH3, yes. Also known as Super-thermite (just look at the url), nano-thermite and even Nanostructured Super-Thermites (take a look at the first url).
The latter url describes a regular thermate mixture.
I'm asking you to read a page of text, complete with some very informative illustrations. You seem to have no problem doing so when the text is mine. I don't understand why it's so hard for you to do when it's someone else's.
geoff said:I have asked you repeatedly to view "Screw Loose Change"
geoff - seems to me you operate with double standards.Geoff said:Because it isn't your work. Summarize it, and support with key sentences.scott3x said:I'm asking you to read a page of text, complete with some very informative illustrations. You seem to have no problem doing so when the text is mine. I don't understand why it's so hard for you to do when it's someone else's.
The evidence for a demolition does not stand up to any scrutiny.It was certainly an unusual demolition.
No. It did not collapse in a manner consistent with a demolition. With the usual conspiracy theorist rationalization you just adjust the story and say that it was a demolition but just an unusual one.For starters, normal demolitions start from the bottom, as happened in WTC 7, not from the top. But it's not undoable.
Have I got this correct? Are they saying that because it collapsed in a manner unlike a demolition then that is actually suspicious and more reason to think there is a conspiracy? If so, that would be a new level of stupidity.Other oddities are expressed in 9/11 Mysteries:
***************************************************
20:31 Now let’s look at the collapse of the Twin Towers:
20:44 We are seeing explosions, rather than implosions -- a first in demolition history.
Why is that a surprise?A sequenced rumble becomes a roar as debris is thrown outward:
20:59 The damage is not contained. Even the windows are blown from neighborhood buildings.
..A 110 story building pancaking.21:07 What kind of energy enabled this? Would fire hurl metal and concrete sideways into the air?
The estimate of 600,000 seems excessive. http://www.911myths.com/html/explosive_force.html Picture middle of the page.21:15 Here, a 600,000-pound chunk of steel (twice the weight of a Boeing airliner) was flung 400 feet, wedging itself deep into Three World Financial Center on Vesey Street.
So if the building had collapsed perfectly in its own footprint then that would have been suspicious. Instead the collapse was a mess and pieces went everywhere so the creative conspiracy theorist decides that must be mysterious instead. These pieces that were ejected are completely consistent with the pancaking theory.21:31 A FEMA photographer taking pictures of Ground Zero wondered why so MANY steel beams were jutting from neighborhood buildings. What shot pieces of the towers all the
way across the street?
***************************************************
I got a few minutes into that film and couldn't take any more.Based on films like this:
http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm
Scott you need to learn to apply critical thinking and stop being so gullible. Just because something is on the internet doesn't make it true.
Originally Posted by scott3xI'm asking you to read a page of text, complete with some very informative illustrations. You seem to have no problem doing so when the text is mine. I don't understand why it's so hard for you to do when it's someone else's.
Because it isn't your work. Summarize it, and support with key sentences.
Not at all. Having seen "Loose Change", I suggested Scott view "Screw Loose Change" for the alternative viewpoint. He refused to do so, claiming it was "hopelessly biased".
So who's the one with the double standards again?
You shut up, Mac, you spook you! Mean old government agent! Don't think we're not on to you!
Ok..I'm coming out of the closet. I'm actually 3rd henchman to the Lizardoid cabel himself.
So I'm curious...why my master would change his "M.O." and switch from planes with the WTC to a missle to attack the pentagon? Wouldn't that be dangerous? What it one of those hundred or so eye witnesses actually snapped a clear pic of the missile, wouldn't that give up the whole gig? Terrorists don't have US missles. And why would my master use a missile anyway? Wouldn't a fully loaded 757 full of fuel do as much if not more damage? It would also mean getting rid of a large aircraft and 300 or so people in a covert way. Too much extra effort for no apparent benefit. Master needs to study "Occam's Razor".
The evidence for a demolition does not stand up to any scrutiny.
It did not collapse in a manner consistent with a demolition.
With the usual conspiracy theorist rationalization you just adjust the story and say that it was a demolition but just an unusual one.
Originally Posted by scott3xOther oddities are expressed in 9/11 Mysteries:
************************************************** *
20:31 Now let’s look at the collapse of the Twin Towers:
20:44 We are seeing explosions, rather than implosions -- a first in demolition history.
Have I got this correct? Are they saying that because it collapsed in a manner unlike a demolition then that is actually suspicious and more reason to think there is a conspiracy? If so, that would be a new level of stupidity.
Originally Posted by scott3xA sequenced rumble becomes a roar as debris is thrown outward:
20:59 The damage is not contained. Even the windows are blown from neighborhood buildings.
Why is that a surprise?
Originally Posted by scott3x21:07 What kind of energy enabled this? Would fire hurl metal and concrete sideways into the air?
..A 110 story building pancaking.
The estimate of 600,000 seems excessive. http://www.911myths.com/html/explosive_force.html Picture middle of the page.
Originally Posted by scott3x21:31 A FEMA photographer taking pictures of Ground Zero wondered why so MANY steel beams were jutting from neighborhood buildings. What shot pieces of the towers all the
way across the street?
**************************************************
So if the building had collapsed perfectly in its own footprint then that would have been suspicious. Instead the collapse was a mess and pieces went everywhere so the creative conspiracy theorist decides that must be mysterious instead. These pieces that were ejected are completely consistent with the pancaking theory.
It doesn't take a great pilot to almost hit the ground.
Why would they risk exposing the entire plot by using an US missile? If ANYONE had snapped a cell phone pic of the missile...the whole gig would have been up.
It's much much easier to use a plane. Plus you never answered what happened to AA flight 77 and the people on board.
So why use a missile? Why would the planners of the attack use planes against one building and a missile against another?
It doesn't make sense...it adds complexity for no reason.
Why add so much more to worry about unnecessarily? Using a missile means having to create a cover story that has to be covered up.
I don't know what was on these 84 vid cam videos. Chances are...they don't show much.
So you don't know what happened to flight 77. If people weren't on the flights...where did they go? We have the flight manifests...we know who was on the plane...did the Lizardoid cabal just make 300 people disappear?
In addition, I had just discovered Black Op Radio earlier in the year and found an interesting show in their archives (# 156) on which Ellen and Mr. Berg appeared as guests. This may be the single biggest point concerning 9-11, and hopefully the last nail in the coffin of our government's lies. During this broadcast, Mrs. Mariani said that she was the only relative of all the passengers that died on Flight 175 that crashed into the South Tower. Her lawyer, Phil Berg, repeated this statement.
Cute theory, but I think you should take a look at the 9/11 mysteries film. Particularly these minutes:
20:31 Now let’s look at the collapse of the Twin Towers:
20:44 We are seeing explosions, rather than implosions -- a first in demolition history.
20:59 The damage is not contained. Even the windows are blown from neighborhood
buildings.
21:07 What kind of energy enabled this? Would fire hurl metal and concrete sideways into the air?
21:15 Here, a 600,000-pound chunk of steel (twice the weight of a Boeing airliner) was flung
400 feet, wedging itself deep into Three World Financial Center on Vesey Street.
21:31 A FEMA photographer taking pictures of Ground Zero wondered why so MANY steel beams were jutting from neighborhood buildings. What shot pieces of the towers all the way across the street?
*****************************************************