You can't destroy something that never existed. I'll say it again: I could go out and pronounce two people as married, and it wouldn’t be ‘destroying the marriage’ for someone to come along and point out that I don’t have the authority to marry people.Undecided said:They still destroyed those marriages, that’s the effect of the ruling.
I agree that it sucks for the people who thought they were married, but any unhappiness they're feeling is the mayor's fault. He's the one who tricked them into thinking that he had the authority to marry them. The judges are just doing their job of analyzing the law in an un-biased way.Granted what the mayor did was legally wrong, but the people who got married should not have their lives altered in such a way.
The legal system doesn't work that way. Worrying about the ethics of laws is the job of the legislature and voters, not judges. And with good reason; if judges were free to ignore or change a law any time they thought is was ethically bad, they could re-write any law to suit their whims or personal prejudices.To me the courts have two responsibilities one to serve the law and one to serve the public, and that involves legal and ethical duties.