Please take time to read the following:
http://www.nicap.org/muj_kasher_sts48.htm
If you can honestly state that this man is unqualified, or incorrect, in any of the 5 proofs that he places forward, I would be very interested in reading what you reciprocate.
He takes measurements from a TV screen, that represent 3D movement, but are displayed in 2D, and makes too many assumptions about what he is seeing. It's a flawed approach.
Are you aware that Sereda has publicly debated his theories with those who officially back up the ice particle perspective? Namely NASA's debunker, Jim Oberg. Sereda tore him a new one in public.
On the 'Art Bell' show? Riiiiiight. Got a transcript of that?
Are you familiar with the Polaris Satellite? This is the satellite that first detected the objects in question. It's strange those at NASA have no problem admitting that 40 foot wide/40 Ton objects are being observed, they just don't know what they are because of everything they consider not conforming to the conventional laws of physics. Yet those here claim that the objects in question are minute in size.
No, I am not familiar with that satellite. In fact, searching NASA for that name, yielded ZERO results;
http://search.nasa.gov/search/search.jsp?nasaInclude=polaris
Do you have a link to information about this satellite? Who built it, who launched it? Who operarates it? What instruments it carries?
Do you mean the TecSAR satellite, launched and operated by Israel? What does that have to do with NASA?
Possibly understanding that the cameras being used on the shuttle are not conventional video cameras, but rather cameras designed to see into the UV spectrum, will illuminate why these abjects are not readily visible to the naked eye or standard camcorders.
Except I saw them on standard camcorder footage, although without the same degree of image artefacts, ....
It is also what makes the tether appear to be so large when in fact it's roughly 75 miles away from the shuttle when the film was taken.
Why? Why do you think the tether appears wider when shot in the alleged UV wavelength?
Do you have any specs that prove the Shuttle cameras can see in UV, btw?