http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shroud_of_Turin
I didn't expect World News to provide any sort of science behind this, so I had to come here.
I didn't expect World News to provide any sort of science behind this, so I had to come here.
It is a actual burial shroud used long after Jesus was supposed to be here. It has already been debunked by analysis through scientific means many years ago.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...6YH4CQ&usg=AFQjCNEE8lBmWZAfpTfDN6LDKH3dohtQcg
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...6YH4CQ&usg=AFQjCNGa4-GppZT8-uJ51AH3oycyqRRpvw
IT IS FAKE!
HERE IS WHY..
If you cover your artwork/painting (as is still common today when you want no peekers) with a blanket the inks will oxidize the image onto the blanket in this exact fashion.
HERE IS PROOF.
The Shroud of Turin has the subject lying down with his hands crossed comfortably over his genital area. This might seem easy for an Orangatang or other long armed Ape species, but humans have much shorter arms.
Try this experiment. Lie down on your bed and try to cover your genitals the way it is portrayed in the painting using your hands. You will find it is not a very natural position as portrayed.
So this is Proof that the shroud of Turin is fake. Try to find anyone who can cover their genitals in a death pose, and you will find this is not human design. If you also use common sense then you might also realize that covering of the genital area seems very convenient as well.
So there you have it. Scientific proof on how to fake a Shroud of Turin, and scientific proof that our bodies are not freaks like the dude in this shroud painting.
Now I have proved it is fake so let's move on.
IT IS FAKE!
HERE IS WHY..
If you cover your artwork/painting (as is still common today when you want no peekers) with a blanket the inks will oxidize the image onto the blanket in this exact fashion.
HERE IS PROOF.
The Shroud of Turin has the subject lying down with his hands crossed comfortably over his genital area. This might seem easy for an Orangatang or other long armed Ape species, but humans have much shorter arms.
Try this experiment. Lie down on your bed and try to cover your genitals the way it is portrayed in the painting using your hands. You will find it is not a very natural position as portrayed.
So this is Proof that the shroud of Turin is fake. Try to find anyone who can cover their genitals in a death pose, and you will find this is not human design. If you also use common sense then you might also realize that covering of the genital area seems very convenient as well.
So there you have it. Scientific proof on how to fake a Shroud of Turin, and scientific proof that our bodies are not freaks like the dude in this shroud painting.
Now I have proved it is fake so let's move on.
Very nice refutation except for one major flaw.
It is very clear from the image that the image of the man of the shroud had his knees slightly bent and his head slightly tilted forward. This is the information you conveniently forgot to research which all shroud researchers know, even skeptics who have researched the shroud fully.
Now with your knees slightly bent and your head tilted forward lay on your bed and try to place your hands on your genitals and you will see that they cover the genitals perfectly.
It seems that everyone here wants the shroud of turin to be a fake so badly they will abandon the honest research and scientific method they claim to love so bad that they could debunk it with ignorance and then move forward.
I won't be here much but this post is just ridiculous and the fact that none of the science lovers here bothered to debunk tells me that with the shroud of turin,you guys are only interested in pseudo evidence that will seem to debunk it.
One guy buries his head in the sand and everyone else cheers him on.
Gotta love the honest scientific enquiry here
Laterz
It was a mystery before scientific analysis,
and it remains a mystery.
It is either
1. A miracle
2. An image formed by radiation, light , heat etc.
3. A photograph
4. An image formed by chemicals, paints, dyes, other fluids.
5. Something else, we don't know what.
There are scientific problems with all the options,
except the first, which is not within the realms of science to confirm,
and the last.
In my opinion it is either number 1 or number 5.
It was a mystery before scientific analysis,
and it remains a mystery.
It is either
1. A miracle
2. An image formed by radiation, light , heat etc.
3. A photograph
4. An image formed by chemicals, paints, dyes, other fluids.
5. Something else, we don't know what.
There are scientific problems with all the options,
except the first, which is not within the realms of science to confirm,
and the last.
In my opinion it is either number 1 or number 5.
It might not be true photography, just the use of some photosensitive chemicals. No lenses were likely involved.That would require that someone invented photography and only used it once.