Fraggle Rocker said:
Again, I can't exclusively single out Islam. Christianity was just as vile at the same point in its 600-year time-displaced track. Emphasis on afterlife over corporeal life, intolerance and forced conversion or outright genocide for infidels, rejection of many of the essential attributes of civilization such as banking, metaphors as art, and scientific inquiry. Judaism has followed a different course since its lack of an evangelical vector has not caused its ranks to swell so it has never achieved dominance even in a local area. Yet within its wacko fundamentalist wing--such as the Orthodox in Israel and the Hassidim elsewhere--the signs are all there. Militant intolerance, an unshakeable sense that everyone else in the world is wrong, retention of ancient traditions that are no longer necessary like eschewing grain-fed pork or even sensible such as grounding ambulances on Saturday.
Surely you realise that this does not include all members of the religion?
And surely you also realise that religion aside, there are differences of opinion even between countries and political systems that are not compatible?
You gotta be joking? If you're an American you must remember the "born again" craze in the late 1970s and early 1980s--that lapse in the national IQ that coincided amusingly with the disco era. Just now we watched the entire State of Kansas install a public school bureaucracy that mandated a thinly disguised version of creationism in its classrooms. Fortunately it was short-lived but it provides a frightening answer to your question.
I'm afraid I must plead ignorance here. I'm not familiar with the concept of "born-again"?
As for Muslim fundamentalism, that growing network of terrorist training camps from Afghanistan to the Philippines to central Africa, financed by the Saudis, are thinly disguised as Islamic schools for boys, for parents without the money to provide an education anywhere else. The parents may be moderate or even secular, but the kids are converted to fundamentalism and militancy, and ultimately for many of them, to the sociopathy of suicide bombers.I am. What I see throughout the history of Abrahamism is a faith that inspires people to be noble... during good times, when they need it the least.
Yes and if you read the link I gave about the origin of suicide bombings you will see that the terrorism in all these three places is related to occupation and/or oppression. Of course I agree with you about the madrasas being used as terrorist training camps. The Mujahideen used to kidnap boys from Kashmir and forcibly induct them into camps. That they are being funded by Al-Qaeda is significant, because the success of 9/11 followed by the widespread panic and the attack on Iraq (if you remember, Al-Qaeda made no offer to "help" Saddam as they did to help Hezbollah ) proved to them that they had finally got it. If you follow Osama's career from 1982 onwards, you can see that he has been trying for several years before 9/11 to get the attention of the US (embassy bombings, etc). Now that he has been "successful" his organization has become the sine qua non of terrorists worldwide. Everyone wants to get in on the action (including Australian teenagers with delusions of grandeur).
But Abrahamism's central flaw is it's binary, one-dimensional model of the human spirit. Everything is rated on a scale between good and evil, and the only two influences in life are a god and a devil. As every cultural expression from the pantheon of the Egyptians and Greeks to the dramatis personae of Shakespeare's plays to the archetypes of Jung's paradigm has discovered, there are something like 23 components to our spirit and each of us resonates to them in different proportions at different times. Some days we need our hunter or our healer to take over, other days our lover or our king, and they all have to wait their turn and contend for our attention in a healthty, constructive way, with a couple of them achieving general prominence. A paradigm that calls the things that would be wrong to do today, in a particular situation, evil, is shoving all of that personality down into the darkness of our soul, where it festers and eventually explodes out through the cracks.
Yes, but there are differences. I do not know about Judaism, but I have read a lot about Christianity on this forum and I can say with certainty that Islamic philosophy is very different. That is why there are allownaces for anger, for revenge, for defense in Islam, due to a recognition that human beings are not infallible, but they are always accompanied by the maxim that in all cases, it is better to forgive and forget. This is to show the difference between the acceptable and the ideal and to realise that the ideal is not always possible. Whatever else Muslims may be, they are not shy to speak their minds or act on their thoughts, no matter how provocative or controversial.
When life turns really lousy--a famine, a plague, a depression in our country while some funny-looking booze-drinking foreigners are prospering--it's natural to get angry. That's when a religion is really needed to remind us that this too shall pass and we must remain good people even when we don't want to be good people.
Yes and in Muslims we say, God is with those who are patient.
Instead, we have that huge well of suppressed spirits inside us to fuel the anger and give it direction. Our warrior becomes a mere soldier, killing everyone in his path. Our king becomes a despot, demanding power over those who have not accepted his authority. Our hunter regards people who aren't like us as animals and hunts them. Our healer and our parent conspire to create a nanny-state of safety-health-fitness-and-sobriety-at-any-cost fascism.
Perhaps this is the reason why some educated Muslims can become terrorists? Because they accept that the oppression and occupation gives them the right to express themselves as they see fit? I don't know. But some Muslims do believe that oppression
must be fought against. They will fight between themselves if they consider themselves oppressed.
The "circumstances that give power to these fringe elements" are universal and cannot be avoided, because they are nothing more or less than the adversity that the universe throws at us regularly.
War and occupation is not an adverse occurrence thrown at us regularly, and if it is we should re-examine why.
If there's anything we can do to disempower the fringe elements of Abrahamism, it's to adopt policies that improve the quality of life for everyone.
I used to think like that before I lived in the ME. I'm from a mixed cosmopolitan society and my family is not religious at all. IMO, all that the Arabs needed was some exposure to the secular ideals of the West. After living there for 4 years, I realised that imposing my notions of secularism on a society not ready to accept it can have the opposite effect. The more I criticised their behavior or interpretation of religion, the more they defended it. It's instinctive to defend what you hold as a part of your identity. I agree that education and secularism should be the ultimate goal, but I doubt that democracy can be forced onto anybody. In India we have a large and diverse community. But when the British came in we were not one country, we were several kingdoms with different languages, customs, food habits, etc. 200 years of British rule could not eradicate the caste system or alter those customs and food habits. Sati is still practised in remote parts of the country; child marriages are still to be seen and we still primarily have arranged marriages( even in Muslims and Christians). How then can a few years of war change the culture of a society that has such limited diversity?
Fundamentalist Christianity rarely gets a foothold in places where people feel safe, healthy, and prosperous. It took hold in America at exactly the time when we began to feel threatened by the political situation in the Middle East, highlighted by the capture of Americans in our own embassy in the capital city of one of our hitherto most dependable allies. It has now taken root throughout the Muslim Third World, where food, clean water, roofs, medical care, and basic safety are tenuous and people will latch onto any hope, no matter how irrational.
Yes and the way out is through education and diplomacy, not war and prejudice.
Recommendation and a bit of proselytism:
Always welcome.
We all fight the darkness in our own ways. My wife and I do it by devoting our entire charity budget to the Central Asia Project in Bozeman, Montana. A regular feature in Parade magazine, this organization grew out of the dream of one man who, due to an accident on a mountain-climbing trip, spent several weeks living in an isolated village and getting a crash course in the sociology of the Muslim Third World. He makes the well-acknowledged point that frat-house, KKK-style lunacy is so easily winning converts in Islamic communities because women have almost no voice. His project is resolutely building schools for girls and coed schools that are required to accept girls throughout the region, including hot spots like Afghanistan.
I agree that women should have a say; even in Israel, it is the women who speak out against the atrocities and the Wall.
So, with my final quotation of your question about "the circumstances that give power to these fringe elements," I reply with a quotation of my own, from a source whose attribution is long forgotten:
"Educating women is the key to peace."
Yes