Why don't We Perceive TIME?

[Asexperia]

WHY DON'T WE PERCEIVE TIME?

Because all events pass simultaneously.

Two dimensions space-time (distance and time)

We have two people: the observer (OBS) and the experimental subject (ES)​​.
In the following graph ES is at 3 meters from the OBS. According to Relativity ES describes a straight line path.

But It's that the OBS also "describes a straight line path", his time goes by at the same manner that the ES's.

We have to conclude that the ES's trajectory, according to the graph, is a mathematical illusion.

Let's consider this another graph:

The ES gets away from the OBS at a speed of 1 m/s. The ES's path in the graph is a straight line inclined.

Here the OBS perceives the ES's movement as a separation, but in both cases time passes equal.

 

[Read-Only]

What utter nonsense! :bugeye:

 

[Asexperia]

Read wrote:
What utter nonsense!

Are you sure!!!!! Why?

Take your time.

 

[Read-Only]

Are you sure!!!!! Why?

Take your time.

Because you've added exactly *nothing* to human knowledge. "Take my time?" You've already done that - and it was a complete waste of my time!!

 

[Asexperia]

Posted by Read:
Because you've added exactly *nothing* to human knowledge.

And because of that is it a utter nonsense?

"Take my time?" You've already done that - and it was a complete waste of my time!!

I'm sorry, I didn't know the value of your time.

 

[Asexperia]

What we perceive as time? (indirectly)

We perceive the occurrence of cycles or intervals that are continually repeated. We observe and register the frequency of occurrence of certain cyclical phenomena. This makes time or duration a statistical parameter rather than physical.

The duration is a parameter that arrange events: timers, time (clock) and date (calendar). The duration is also a cumulative data.

 

[el es]

The perception of Kantian Time is a philosophical matter.

Einstein's clockwork Time amounts to agreed upon increments of duration that can be plastic, unlike Newton's absolute Time.

 

[brucep]

What utter nonsense! :bugeye:

Ditto. It is utter nonsense.

 

[Mazulu]

To understand time, you really need to understand the definition of one second.

 

[Asexperia]

Posted by el es:
The perception of Kantian Time is a philosophical matter.
Einstein's clockwork Time amounts to agreed upon increments of duration that can be plastic, unlike Newton's absolute Time.

The nature of time is a subject that corresponds to several disciplines: Philosophy, Physics, Psychology and also Statistics.

Posted by Brucep:
Ditto. It is utter nonsense.

Non c'e problema. No problem.

Posted by Mazulu:
To understand time, you really need to understand the definition of one second.

Correct, the artificial basic unit of time is the second. Bigger units are expressed by the frequency of occurrence of the second (statistically).

 

[tashja]

Maybe at the quantum level?

'' Within the framework of the laws of physics as we understand them today, for times less than one Planck time apart, we can neither measure nor detect any change.'' Wiki

 

[scheherazade]

I would merely remark that despite having a very good understanding of the duration of 'one second' and portions thereof, after working several years on graveyards I feel qualified to comment that one's perception of 'time' would appear to be influenced to some degree by our own personal circadian rhythms, which are also measurable cycles.

 

[Quantum Quack]

Another slant is that as we [ observer POV ] are changing at the same rate the universe is, the passage of time is only avaialble as hindsight. One can not directly peceive the passing of a moment as one is moving with that moment all the time...
In other words your body, which is mass is changing at the same rate as everything else...so how can you possibly perceive time when YOU ARE IN time with everything else.

 

[Asexperia]

Posted by Tashja:
Maybe at the quantum level?
'' Within the framework of the laws of physics as we understand them today, for times less than one Planck time apart, we can neither measure nor detect any change.'' Wiki

LEVELS OF THE COSMOLOGICAL DUALITY

Random is chance, that doesn't follow the principle of causality. In B-R governs the uncertainty principle.

In B-T the random becomes ordination and applies the principle of causality.

In D-T the becoming is no longer relevant due to the vastness of the universe. Governed by the principle of light-year.

The distance is the length of the line segment between two points in space.

 

[Asexperia]

Schehe wrote:
I would merely remark that despite having a very good understanding of the duration of 'one second' and portions thereof, after working several years on graveyards I feel qualified to comment that one's perception of 'time' would appear to be influenced to some degree by our own personal circadian rhythms, which are also measurable cycles.

And circadian rhythms are synchronized with the cycles of the earth. When we travel from one time zone to another we have to adapt our body to change.

Posted by Quantum:
Another slant is that as we [ observer POV ] are changing at the same rate the universe is, the passage of time is only available as hindsight. One can not directly perceive the passing of a moment as one is moving with that moment all the time...
In other words your body, which is mass is changing at the same rate as everything else...so how can you possibly perceive time when YOU ARE IN time with everything else.

You're right. We perceive changes (becoming) and we intuit intervals or the extension of phenomena (time).