European television is a veritable smorgasbord of human flesh. Remember… we don't like that sort of thing here, obviously. Boobs are the devil's pillows.
Those Europeans perverts seem to think that the human body is beautiful, but don’t seem to understand that it might give some unsuspecting male an erection. Right-thinking Americans recognize it for the pure, unadulterated evil that it truly is. Any sight that could lead someone to think about something as dirty and evil as sex is clearly the work of the devil, and the fact that Europeans think it beautiful just shows how deeply they are already in Satan's grip. Can you imagine the hell that would result if American kids were allowed to believe that engaging in sex was a natural, normal, or acceptable human act?
Come on people, breasts are some of the first things people ever see after first opening their eyes to this world. Are European kids really suffering from some ill effects that the folks in America, who complain about their kids seeing Janet Jackson's breast, are worried about? I'm not sure what those effects are, but are, say, German kids suffering from these afflictions because they haven't been as vigilantly protected? Or are non-American kids somehow more hardy and can resist the dangerous sight of a nipple more effectively without becoming a serial rapist? European television does not censor sex and nudity because they consider it a normal and natural occurrence. They do censor violence, however. I'd rather see nipples than decapitations, but I guess I'm not like most of my fellow Americans.
Have any of these groups that regularly protest things like The Tit That Shook America laid out what they are worried about, and used European statistics to back up their claims? To make up an example, have they made claims that nudity leads to kids experimenting with sex earlier and getting pregnant, and then showed statistics that a European country with regular TV nudity has a higher teenage pregancy rate?
Or have they simply grunted, "me no like" with no claims that can be challenged?
:m: Peace.
Those Europeans perverts seem to think that the human body is beautiful, but don’t seem to understand that it might give some unsuspecting male an erection. Right-thinking Americans recognize it for the pure, unadulterated evil that it truly is. Any sight that could lead someone to think about something as dirty and evil as sex is clearly the work of the devil, and the fact that Europeans think it beautiful just shows how deeply they are already in Satan's grip. Can you imagine the hell that would result if American kids were allowed to believe that engaging in sex was a natural, normal, or acceptable human act?
Come on people, breasts are some of the first things people ever see after first opening their eyes to this world. Are European kids really suffering from some ill effects that the folks in America, who complain about their kids seeing Janet Jackson's breast, are worried about? I'm not sure what those effects are, but are, say, German kids suffering from these afflictions because they haven't been as vigilantly protected? Or are non-American kids somehow more hardy and can resist the dangerous sight of a nipple more effectively without becoming a serial rapist? European television does not censor sex and nudity because they consider it a normal and natural occurrence. They do censor violence, however. I'd rather see nipples than decapitations, but I guess I'm not like most of my fellow Americans.
Have any of these groups that regularly protest things like The Tit That Shook America laid out what they are worried about, and used European statistics to back up their claims? To make up an example, have they made claims that nudity leads to kids experimenting with sex earlier and getting pregnant, and then showed statistics that a European country with regular TV nudity has a higher teenage pregancy rate?
Or have they simply grunted, "me no like" with no claims that can be challenged?
:m: Peace.